You are here:
AustLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of New South Wales >>
2011 >>
[2011] NSWSC 1023
[Database Search]
[Name Search]
[Recent Decisions]
[Noteup]
[Download]
[Context] [No Context] [Help]
Beattie v Daly [2011] NSWSC 1023 (1 September 2011)
Last Updated: 6 September 2011
Case Title:
|
|
|
|
Medium Neutral Citation:
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date(s):
|
|
|
|
Decision Date:
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction:
|
|
|
|
Before:
|
|
|
|
Decision:
|
Authority not blank when signed. Donor had capacity
to make gift. Gift perfected. Donee's taking cheque from Donor's letter box not
illegal. Authority not terminated on death. No undue influence.
|
|
|
Catchwords:
|
GIFTS - Gifts Inter Vivos - whether made - whether
undue influence - whether unconscionable to retain - imperfect gifts - authority
to draw cheque - cheque drawn, presented and paid after donor's death - donee
not requiring court's assistance to acquire cheque
|
|
|
Legislation Cited:
|
|
|
|
Cases Cited:
|
|
|
|
Texts Cited:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parties:
|
Janelle Beattie (First
Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Peter Shannessy (Second Plaintiff) Garry Daly
(First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Michael Shannessy (Second
Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant)
|
|
|
Representation
|
|
|
|
Counsel L Ellison SC
(Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendant) N Kirby (Defendants/Cross-Claimants)
|
|
|
- Solicitors:
|
Solicitors Matthew Trevillion
(Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendant) Turner Freeman
(Defendants/Cross-Claimants)
|
|
|
File number(s):
|
|
|
Publication Restriction:
|
|
Judgment
- Isabel
Maud Webb known as Betty Webb died on 26 December 2007. She was not married and
had no children. She left her estate to her
nieces and nephews.
- To
her nephew Mark Webb and her niece Alyson Yoshida she gave $1,000 each. The rest
of her estate she gave equally to her niece Janelle
Beattie and her nephews
Garry Daly, Michael Shannessy, Peter Shannessy and Jeffery Daly.
- Probate
of her will was granted to her executors and trustees, Garry Daly and Michael
Shannessy.
- The
plaintiffs, Janelle Beattie and Peter Shannessy, seek an order that probate
granted to Garry Daly and Michael Shannessy be revoked
and that Janelle Beattie
be appointed administrator cta of the will.
- On
15 December 2007, Betty Webb signed a piece of paper. The paper contained
writing addressed to Uniting Financial Services for the
attention of Andrew
Scott as follows:
"Re:- Termination Of Account No. XXXXXXXXX.X
Deposit No XXX
Good morning Andrew,
Further to your discussions with my Niece Janelle Shannessy, I authorize the
release of the funds in the above mention account to
Janelle Dianne Shannessy,
effective todays Friday 15 th December 2007.
Regards,
Ms Isabel Webb"
- Janelle
Beattie said she posted the piece of paper the next day. It has a receipt stamp
of Uniting Financial Services dated 24 December
2007. A cheque for $28,180.48 in
favour of Janelle Beattie on the account of Betty Webb was drawn on 27 December
2007 after Betty
Webb's death on 26 December 2007. On 31 December 2007 Janelle
Beattie took the cheque from Betty Webb's letterbox and cashed it in
January
2008.
- By
amended cross-claim, Garry Daly and Michael Shannessy sought an order against
Janelle Beattie that the transaction embodied in
the letter dated 15 December
2007 be set aside, a declaration that Janelle Beattie held $28,180.48 on trust
for them, an order for
payment to them together with interest and damages for
conversion in the amount of the cheque.
- Garry
Daly and Michael Shannessy allege that Betty Webb signed a blank piece of paper
on 15 December 2007 on the urging of Janelle
Beattie. They rely upon hospital
clinical notes that at 5.15 am on 17 December 2007 recorded:
"Pt unsettled throught shift; on/off during night. Upset about a relative
that visited her yesterday pm? Making her sign a blank paper.
Pt states,
expressed to be very anxious @ beginning of ND."
- The
clinical notes were a continuous record and accurately stated the time of this
conversation. Betty Webb was confused. She had
signed the paper on 15 December
2007.
- Max
Dennett had been Betty Webb's partner for 26 years. He affirmed in his affidavit
that he went to the hospital and had a conversation
with Betty Webb as follows:
"Betty: I just signed a blank piece of paper. It was so silly of me to sign a
blank paper - I was mad to do that. As soon as I signed
it, I realised it was
the silliest thing to do.
Max: Look, I rang up Joyce before coming here and spoke to her about it. She
said that you shouldn't worry about it - maybe it was
just something to do with
your pension."
- Joyce
Daly was the sister of Betty Webb. The probability is that this visit occurred
later on 17 December 2007. Again, Betty Webb
was confused as she had not "just
signed" the letter. Max Dennett died before trial.
- On
18 December 2007 Betty Webb was interviewed by a social worker. The clinical
notes contained the following:
"Initial interview with Pt. Note events over the w/end (? pt unsure about
signing a blank document)... Pt stated the 'blank document'
was not blank. It
was in fact concerning her pension + it was her niece, Janelle, that had asked
her to sign it. Pt stated this is
no longer a concern."
- Janelle
Beattie said she typed the letter of 15 December 2007 after Betty Webb had
insisted that she accept the gift and after she
had spoken with Andrew Scott as
to what was necessary to close the fund.
- Max
Dennett was not available for cross-examination and Janelle Beattie was not
shaken in cross-examination.
- Garry
Daly and Michael Shannessy relied solely on the entry in the clinical notes of
17 December 2007. They refused to accept that
the letter of 15 December 2007 had
ceased to be a matter of concern to Betty Webb by 18 December 2007. They
complained to the Fraud
Squad and when the police declined to act they obtained
the records of the police investigation under the Freedom of Information Act
1982 (Cth).
- Janelle
Beattie said that Betty Webb had always said that money was set aside for her.
She said that Betty Webb had said that when
she got back from a holiday in Bali
she would sit down and have the money sent. But Janelle Beattie said that she
discouraged the
gift telling Betty Webb she should spend it on herself and go on
further trips.
- According
to Janelle Beattie, Betty Webb was alert when she read and signed the letter on
15 December 2007. When she arrived, Betty
Webb was sitting up having a cup of
tea. She asked: "Is that letter we spoke about typed up yet?" Having read the
letter, Betty Webb
said: "that's good" and signed it. She then said: "I'm glad
you're going to get the money for all you've done for me over the years".
A few
days later Betty Webb said: "have you got the cheque yet?" to which Janelle
Beattie replied: "no I haven't yet, next time I
go to the unit I'll check your
letters."
- Janelle
Beattie was an unsatisfactory witness. Notwithstanding the specific details of
conversations in her affidavit, she maintained
throughout her cross-examination
that she could not generalise and did not remember conversations or dates. She
said Betty Webb,
just in general conversation, said that she had money put aside
for her.
- But
her testimony, general though it was, was supported by the evidence of her
husband Christopher Beattie and her mother-in-law Janette
Beattie.
- Christopher
Beattie said that at the hospital he heard Betty Webb say that she wanted to
give Janelle money in a fund. He said that
Betty Webb would need to give a
letter of authority. He was at the hospital when Beattie Webb signed the letter
of 15 December 2007.
He said he saw her read the letter then sign it.
- There
was an aberration in the evidence. Christopher Beattie said that he heard Betty
Webb once at her unit say she wanted to give
Janelle Beattie money in a fund
when it matured to which he said Janelle Beattie replied: "that would be very
kind". That was inconsistent
with Janelle Beattie's statement that when offered
the gift in conversation she replied that Betty Webb should use the money on
herself.
But I do not regard that as sufficient to doubt the evidence of Janelle
Beattie or that of her husband.
- Janette
Beattie was an impressive witness. She thought about her answers and was precise
in her recounting of events. She said that
on a number of occasions she heard
Betty Webb say that she had approximately $20,000 that she was going to give to
Janelle Beattie.
She said that this happened more than once in the hospital as
well as on earlier occasions. She said that Janelle declined the gift
on a
number of occasions. In the hospital she said that Betty Webb said she wanted to
give Janelle something because she had always
been so good to her. She said that
on that occasion she did not think that she mentioned how much. It was put to
her that she swore
her affidavit to help Janelle Beattie. She said: "no, I
didn't think that, I don't think that. Betty wanted her to have it."
- Janette
Beattie was present when Betty Webb signed the letter of 15 December 2007. She
was taxed about her inability to remember what
was said when the letter was
signed and it was suggested to her that she had not witnessed the signing
because her affidavit was
based on an earlier declaration, the only difference
being that in the affidavit she did not repeat what she had said in the
declaration
about being present when the letter was signed. Janette Beattie
denied this suggestion.
- Peter
David Shannessy, Janelle Beattie's brother, said he spoke with Betty Webb in the
hospital when she mentioned that she had the
intention of giving Janelle Beattie
money. That was all she said because Peter Shannessy said that each time she
ventured down this
avenue he would stop her by saying that she should just worry
about getting better.
- Reliance
was placed upon complaints made by Betty Webb about Janelle Beattie. Garry Daly
said that Betty Webb complained after her
trip to Bali that Janelle Beattie had
stuffed her bags with things without telling her what they were and she was
worried about Customs.
She also said that she had paid for things twice during
the trip to Bali and Janelle Beattie had forced her to terminate a rental
agreement over her garage.
- Michael
Shannessy said that Betty Webb complained to him that Janelle Beattie had
stuffed her bags with her own things and did not
tell her what they were and she
was worried about taking them through Customs. When they got back to Sydney,
Chris Beattie picked
up Janelle Beattie at the airport and she was forced to
take a taxi home and had to carry her luggage up the stairs to her unit.
- Joyce
Daly said that Betty Webb complained to her that Janelle had made her terminate
a rental agreement over her garage, as Janelle
needed it for a while as she was
moving to Queensland. She said Janelle Beattie put her things in her luggage and
did not tell her
what they were and Christopher Beattie picked Janelle Beattie
up from the airport and she had to take a taxi home carrying her luggage
herself. Joyce Daly also said that Betty Webb complained that she paid for the
tickets twice. Joyce Daly was confused because she
also said that the taxi
driver had carried her bag to her unit.
- Max
Dennett affirmed that Betty Webb told him when she returned from Bali that she
had paid for the trip twice because Janelle Beattie
had insisted that she had
not paid on the first occasion
- On
the other hand, Janelle Beattie candidly said she had asked Betty Webb to cancel
the rental agreement on the garage and she and
Janette Beattie pointed out that
Betty Webb had travelled back from Bali with Janette Beattie while Janelle
Beattie and her family
remained behind. Janette Beattie had travelled in a taxi
with Betty Webb to her unit where she asked the driver to take the bags
upstairs.
- Betty
Webb was clearly confused about the details of the Bali trip. Janelle Beattie
said that she had bought Betty Webb's ticket on
her credit card, which Betty
Webb refunded months later. What she had put in Betty Webb's bag were children's
outfits that she intended
to sell. Janelle Webb said that Betty Webb did not
have foreign currency with her in Bali and she gave her hers.
- Peter
Shannessy said that when Betty Webb got to Bali she did not have money with her
and Janelle Beattie helped her out.
- Because
Betty Webb complained about Janelle Beattie, wrongly as it turns out, does not
mean that she would not make a gift to Janelle
Beattie. Her complaints may have
been regarded as mere irritation by Betty Webb, insufficient for her to change
her mind about making
a gift to Janelle Beattie.
- I
prefer the evidence of those who saw Betty Webb sign the letter of 15 December
2007, Janelle Beattie, Christopher Beattie and Janette
Beattie. I find that the
letter of 15 December 2007 was not blank when it was signed by Betty Webb and
she signed it intending to
make a gift of the moneys in the fund to Janelle
Beattie.
- I
find that Betty Webb was confused when on 17 December 2007 she said she had
signed a blank piece of paper.
- The
executors alleged that Betty Webb was not of sound mind on 15 December 2007. I
reject that submission. There is nothing in the
clinical notes to support the
contention. Her health was recovering such that the medical staff contemplated
the removal of the external
pacemaker and it was disconnected on the morning of
16 December 2007. It was only at 7.00 pm on that day that she was noted to be
short of breath and she had the unsettled night reflected in the note made at
5.15 am on 17 December 2007.
- Janelle
Beattie said that the deceased raised the subject of the document, which was
produced, she read it and signed it. A few days
later she raised the subject
again.
- According
to Michael Shannessy she was recovering quite well.
- Joyce
Daly recorded conversations with Betty Webb about the account she had and its
prospective maturity. That was in November 2007.
- Betty
Webb was alert, sitting up having a cup of tea when the letter was signed.
- All
of this evidence negates the suggestion that on 15 December 2007 Betty Webb
lacked the mental capacity to make a gift.
- The
executors then submitted that the gift was never perfected and equity will not
assist a volunteer. Reference was made to Corin v Patton [1990] HCA 12;
(1990) 169 CLR 540 at 559, 582.
- But
Janelle Beattie did not need the assistance of equity to perfect the gift. She
had the money that Betty Webb intended she should
have. As Young CJ in Eq
pointed out in Blackett v Darcy [2005] NSWSC 65; (2005) 62 NSWLR 392 the
rule that equity does not assist a volunteer is not a complete statement of the
law .
- That
was a case in which two days before his death the testator drew a cheque for
$650,000 in favour of his executor and one of her
brothers. It was contemplated
that the $650,000 would be used to buy a home which would be in the control of
the executor on condition
that she looked after her two brothers. The day after
the testator's death, the cheque was deposited into the bank account of the
executor and her brother and was paid. It was held that the money did not form
part of the testator's estate on the basis that the
commercial attributes of a
cheque are now such that if parties behave in a way that they intend the cheque
to constitute a gift the
gift may be complete even though the cheque is not
presented before the death of the drawer and on the basis of the absence of the
need for the aid of equity. His Honour said at [31]; 397:
"It must always be remembered that the rule that equity does not assist a
volunteer is not a complete statement of the law and is
only relevant if the
donee requires the assistance of a court of equity in order to gain the
property. Where the donee has gained
the property (at least where he or she has
not done so illegally), then there is usually no equity in the donor to recover
back the
monies."
- It
was submitted that it was illegal for Janelle Beattie to take the envelope with
the cheque from Betty Webb's post box and that
Blackett did not apply.
- But
Andrew Scott had told Janelle Beattie the cheque would be sent to Betty Webb's
address and the letter of 15 September 2007 was
headed by the address of Betty
Webb. Janelle Beattie expected the cheque to be posted to Betty Webb's address.
Betty Webb knew it
was going to her address and, by her silence in response to
Janelle Beattie's statement that she would check the mail at Betty Webb's
address, she consented to Janelle Beattie's taking the cheque when it arrived in
Betty Webb's mailbox.
- I
do not understand Young CJ in Eq's possible exception for illegality to apply to
the instant circumstances. Betty Webb intended
that Janelle Beattie have the
cheque to be issued by Uniting Financial Services. She found the envelope from
that company in the
letterbox and took it. That is what Betty Webb wanted her to
do. I reject the submission that Betty Webb's gift was not perfected.
- The
executors then argued that the authority terminated when Betty Webb fell into a
coma on 20 December 2007 or, at the latest, when
she died on 26 December 2007.
- I
do not accept that the authority terminated when Betty Webb became
incapacitated. No authority was cited for this proposition.
- Nor
do I accept that the authority terminated on the death of Betty Webb. The
authority was all that Betty Webb could do to perfect
her gift. The situation is
analogous to that in Watt v Lord and Another [2005] NSWSC 53; (2005) 62
NSWLR 495 where I held that where a memorandum of transfer in registrable form
and a certificate of title had been delivered to a transferee,
the transferee
had a right to registration and the Registrar-General was not precluded from
registering the transfer by reason of
the deaths of the registered proprietors.
At [54]; 507 I said:
"In my view, I am not bound by authority to conclude that the memorandum of
transfer in this case became ineffective upon the death
of Mr and Mrs Holliday
senior. They had armed Mr Colin Lord with an instrument in registrable form and
the certificate of title and
they took no further interest in the land. In my
view, the memorandum of transfer remains an effective document and the
Registrar-General
is not precluded from registering the transfer by reason of
the deaths of the registered proprietors."
- By
the letter of 15 December 2007 Betty Webb had armed Uniting Financial Services
with authority to draw a cheque in favour of Janelle
Beattie in the amount in
her account. It was, therefore, appropriate for Uniting Financial Services to
act on the authority and draw
the cheque in favour of Janelle Beattie and to
deliver it to the post box of Betty Webb. That was done. The gift was complete.
- Finally,
the executors alleged that Betty Webb signed the authority under undue influence
from Janelle Beattie. It was submitted that
Betty Webb was in a position of
special disadvantage to Janelle Beattie. Alternatively, it was submitted that it
was unconscionable
for Janelle Beattie to retain the benefit of the transaction.
- I
reject those submissions. It was Betty Webb who initiated the making of the
gift. It was she who inquired whether Janelle Beattie
had received the cheque.
Her confusion about a blank piece of paper was dispelled. Christopher Beattie
and Janette Beattie observed
no undue influence when Betty Webb signed the
letter of 15 December 2007.
- Betty
Webb wanted Janelle Beattie to have the money because she had always been good
to her. In those circumstances it could hardly
be said to be unconscionable
conduct on Janelle Beattie's part to retain the gift intended for her.
- I
find that Betty Webb made a gift of the balance standing to her account with
Uniting Financial Services and that the gift was perfected
notwithstanding her
intervening death.
- I
will hear the parties on the appropriate form of orders with respect to the
claim and the cross-claim and I will hear the parties
on costs.
**********
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2011/1023.html