SUPREME COURT CIVIL PROCEDURE ACT 1932 - SECT 4 Supreme Court may exercise jurisdiction in Admiralty actions [100%]
(From Tasmanian Consolidated Acts; 1 January 1932; 1 KB)   

Frank Carlyle Bardenhagen v Tasmanian Board Mills and Northern Forest Investments Pty Ltd [1993] TASSC 151 (8 December 1993) [50%]
(From Supreme Court of Tasmania; 8 December 1993; 14 KB)     

Butler v Electrolytic Zinc Co of Australasia Ltd [1975] TASStRp 2; [1975] Tas SR 9 (14 February 1975) [33%]
(From State Reports (Tasmania); 14 February 1975; 31 KB)     

SUPREME COURT CIVIL PROCEDURE ACT 1932 - SCHEDULE I - RepealsIMPERIAL STATUTES [16%]
(From Tasmanian Consolidated Acts; 1 January 1932; 23 KB)   

Anthony Gilbert Leitch v Keith Edward McCarthy (No 2) [1995] TASSC 118 (9 October 1995) [16%]
(From Supreme Court of Tasmania; 9 October 1995; 23 KB)     

Duffin v Chivers [1973] TASStRp 7; [1973] Tas SR 72 (11 September 1973) [16%]
(From State Reports (Tasmania); 11 September 1973; 18 KB)     

Review of the Judicial Review Act 2000 (Tas) [2020] TASLRI 29 [16%]
(From Tasmania Law Reform Institute - Reports; 15 January 2020; 573 KB)     

Kraemers v Her Majesty's Attorney-General For The State of Tasmania [1966] TASStRp 15; [1966] Tas SR 113 (24 August 1966) [16%]
(From State Reports (Tasmania); 24 August 1966; 135 KB)