SUPREME COURT CIVIL PROCEDURE ACT 1932 - SECT 74 Distribution costs excessive [100%]
(From Tasmanian Consolidated Acts; 1 January 1932; 3 KB)   

SUPREME COURT CIVIL PROCEDURE ACT 1932 - SECT 76 Effect of discontinuance order under this Part [42%]
(From Tasmanian Consolidated Acts; 1 January 1932; 3 KB)   

Class Actions and Litigation Funding [2020] NZLCIP 45; Class Actions and Litigation Funding [2020] NZLCIP 45; Ko ngā Hunga Take Whaipānga me ngā Pūtea Tautiringa [28%]
(From New Zealand Law Commission - Issues Papers; 4 December 2020; 1925 KB)     

Regina v Mcarthur; Ex Parte Cornish [1966] TASStRp 18; [1966] Tas SR 157 (5 October 1966) [14%]
(From State Reports (Tasmania); 5 October 1966; 26 KB)     

Regina v Oldham; Ex Parte The Registrar of Motor Vehicles [1966] TASStRp 9; [1966] Tas SR 80 (20 May 1966) [14%]
(From State Reports (Tasmania); 20 May 1966; 21 KB)     

The Board of Optical Registration v Grist [1989] TASRp 25; [1989] Tas R 284 (20 December 1989) [14%]
(From Tasmanian Reports; 20 December 1989; 45 KB)     

Routledge v A E Jack Nominees Pty Ltd [1982] TASRp 10; [1982] Tas R 81 (16 June 1982) [14%]
(From Tasmanian Reports; 16 June 1982; 29 KB)     

Board of Optical Registration v Grist [1989] TASSC 75 (20 December 1989) [14%]
(From Supreme Court of Tasmania; 20 December 1989; 46 KB)     

R v Betting Control Board; Ex parte Stone [1948] TASStRp 10; [1948] Tas SR 4 (15 October 1948) [14%]
(From State Reports (Tasmania); 15 October 1948; 52 KB)