Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
IN THE court of appeal of new zealand |
ca59/01 |
between |
enza limited | |
Appellant |
AND |
apple and pear export permits committee | |
First Respondent |
and |
freilich & sons Ltd | |
Second Respondent |
AND |
freshmax ltd | |
Third Respondent |
and |
fresh fruit company new zealand ltd | |
Fourth Respondent |
and |
the attorney-general | |
Intervener |
Hearing: |
4 April 2001 |
Coram: |
Keith J Tipping J McGrath J |
Appearances: |
H McIntosh and A Olney for Appellant C F Finlayson and D D Vincent for First Respondent No appearance for Second and Third Respondents G M Illingworth for Fourth Respondent H M Aikman and A H Cecil-Gibson for Intervener |
Judgment: |
11 April 2001 |
judgment of the court |
[1] For reasons to be given at a later date the appeal is dismissed, with the result that the decision of the High Court dismissing the appellant's application for production and inspection of documents is upheld.The appellant must pay costs of the respondents represented in this court and the intervener in the sum of $2,500 each together with disbursements and in the case of the fourth respondent, reasonable travelling and accommodation costs of counsel, all to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar.
Solicitors
Russell McVeagh, Wellington, for Appellant
Bell Gully, Wellington, for First Respondent
P J McDonald, Auckland, for Fourth Respondent
Crown Law Office, Wellington, for Intervener
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2001/129.html