![]() |
Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND
WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL
McGrath J
Appearances: R M Lithgow for the Appellant
[1] | Mr Baxter, the appellant, was convicted in the District Court of breaching a Wellington City Council Bylaw which read: |
No person shall live or sleep in a vehicle situated on a road, or use a vehicle situated on a road for any other residential purpose, without the written consent of the City Planner.
(See Wellington City Council v Baxter [2003] DCR 242).
[2] | His appeal to the High Court was dismissed as was his application for leave to appeal to this Court. This Court did however give special leave to appeal under s144 of the Summary Proceedings Act 1957. |
[3] | The Wellington City Council now accepts that the bylaw is invalid for uncertainty. |
[4] | The parties therefore are agreed, to quote from a joint memorandum of counsel: |
3.1 That the consolidated by-laws 1991 clause 17.7.1 is invalid for uncertainty.
3.2 Warren Baxter is not guilty of the offence charged in information CRN1085028060.
3.3 That the conviction should be set aside and no re-hearing ordered.
[5] | Accordingly, by consent, the appeal is allowed and the conviction is set aside.There will be no rehearing. |
[6] | The question of costs has been agreed between the parties. |
Solicitors:
Phillips Fox, Wellington for the Respondent
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2003/227.html