Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
Last Updated: 27 July 2014
|
|
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND
|
|
BETWEEN
|
Appellant |
AND
|
Respondent
|
JUDGMENT OF HARRISON J
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS
[1] On 26 May 2014 the appellant, Razdan Rafiq, applied to review a decision made by the Registrar on 15 May 2014, declining his application to dispense with security for costs on this appeal. She directed that the security be set at $5,880.00 and be paid on or before 12 June 2014.
[2] The grounds for the Registrar’s direction were that Mr Rafiq had failed to establish it was in the interests of justice that costs be waived. In particular she was not satisfied that there were any exceptional circumstances justifying dispensation. Impecuniosity alone does not suffice.[1] Furthermore, the appeal does not raise an issue of public importance or significance.
[3] The Registrar was also entitled to give weight to the conclusion of Associate Judge Doogue, whose judgment is the subject of Mr Rafiq’s appeal, that his application to pursue a claim against the Commissioner had little prospect of success.[2]
[4] Mr Rafiq has failed to establish that the Registrar erred. Additionally I am independently satisfied that the appeal has no merit or prospects of success. The application to review is dismissed. Mr Rafiq is to pay the sum of $5,880.00 by way of security for costs on or before 30 July 2014.
Solicitors:
Simpson Grierson, Auckland for
Respondent
[1] Fava v Zaghloul [2007] NZCA 498, (2008) 18 PRNZ 943 at [9].
[2] Rafiq v Google New Zealand Ltd [2014] NZHC 551 at [14]–[16].
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2014/320.html