Collins & May Law v Memelink [2018] NZCA 29 (1 March 2018)

Last Updated: 9 March 2018

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND
CA159/2016 [2018] NZCA 29
BETWEEN	COLLINS & MAY LAW Appellant
AND	HARRY MEMELINK AND PATRICK JOHN RENSHAW AS TRUSTEES OF THE LINK TRUST (NO 1) First Respondent HARRY MEMELINK Second Respondent

Court:	Miller, Simon France and Toogood JJ
Counsel:	H M Twomey and M O Fee for Appellant Q S Haines for Respondents
Judgment: (On the papers)	1 March 2018 at 11.00 am

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

The respondents must pay the appellant costs for a standard appeal on a band A basis and usual disbursements.
____________________________________________________________________

REASONS OF THE COURT

(Given by Miller J)

[1] The Court has received counsels’ memoranda on costs, which were reserved at the hearing.
[2] The appellant was successful and is entitled to costs for a standard appeal on a band A basis with usual disbursements on the appeal and cross-appeal.
[3] There is a question whether the appellant should recover costs for various interlocutory matters concerning the payment of security for costs on the respondents’ crossappeal. These costs were incurred as part of the appeal proceeding to hearing and are properly recoverable. However, recovery should be based on band A of Schedule 2 to the Court’s rules, meaning that 0.4 days should be allowed for all the items claimed.
[4] Finally, the appellant has requested that the Court certify for second counsel. We decline to do so.
[5] The appellant may seal judgment for costs accordingly, and costs may be deducted from security held for the cross-appeal.

Solicitors:
Robertsons, Auckland for Appellant
QH Law, Levin for Respondents