Tao v Strata Title Administration Limited [2019] NZCA 79 (29 March 2019)

Last Updated: 2 April 2019

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA

CA235/2018 [2019] NZCA 79

	BETWEEN	AN LI TAO Applicant
	AND	STRATA TITLE ADMINISTRATION LIMITED First Respondent JIGAR PANDYA Second Respondent BODY CORPORATE 198693 Third Respondent

Court:	Miller and Williams JJ
Counsel:	Applicant in person P J Muir for Respondents
Judgment: (On the papers)	29 March 2019 at 11.00 am

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

The application for an extension of time to apply for a hearing date and file a case on appeal is declined.
____________________________________________________________________

REASONS OF THE COURT

(Given by Miller J)

[1] This judgment responds to Ms Tao’s application for extension of time to apply for a hearing date and file a case on appeal under r 43 of the Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005.
[2] The appeal was brought against a decision of Associate Judge Matthews declining Ms Tao’s application to set aside a bankruptcy notice issued by the respondents. That judgment was delivered on 30 April 2018.^[1] Security for costs was payable by 13 August 2018, and the present application was filed on 15 August 2018.
[3] Ms Tao contends that her appeal has merit. In support, she points to grounds which were examined in the decisions below and rejected. The merits do not appear strong. There is no doubt she has committed an act of bankruptcy.
[4] Ms Tao was adjudicated bankrupt on 29 January 2019. The present appeal is accordingly relevant only insofar as, if successful, it would remove the foundation for the order of adjudication, against which Ms Tao has a separate right of appeal.^[2]
[5] Finally, Ms Tao has not advanced any satisfactory explanation for the long delay in progressing this matter, and she has not paid security for costs despite promising that she would do so some months ago. She says that she is unable now to pay security for costs, but an application for dispensation or reduction was previously declined on 27 July 2018.
[6] For these reasons no purpose would be served by granting the extension, which is declined.

Solicitors:
Price Baker Berridge, Auckland for Respondents

---

^[1] Tao v Strata Title Administration Ltd [2018] NZHC 848.

^[2] Khan v Reid [2011] NZCA 22; and Insolvency Act 2006, s 61.