Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
Last Updated: 12 August 2020
|
|
BETWEEN |
SOLICITOR-GENERAL Applicant |
|
|
|
Court: |
Miller and Gilbert JJ |
Counsel: |
R K Thomson for Applicant |
Judgment: (On the papers) |
5 August 2020 at 11.00 am |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The application
for leave to refer a question of law to this Court is
granted.
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS OF THE COURT
(Given by Miller J)
Question 1
Was the Judge in each case correct to find there had been non-compliance with ss 77(3)(a) and (3A) of the Land Transport Act 1998 (“the Act”), by reason of the wording of Block J on the Police Procedure Sheet POL515 09/19?
Question 2
If the answer to question 1 is yes, was the Judge in each case correct to find as a result there had not been reasonable compliance with ss 77(3)(a) and (3A), in terms of s 64(2) of the Act, such that evidence of the Evidential Breath Test (EBT) result was inadmissible?
Solicitors:
Crown Law Office, Wellington for Applicant
[1] Police v Stewart [2020] NZDC 11392; Police v Thakoor [2020] NZDC 10980; Police v Yang [2020] NZDC 10304; and Police v Taylor [2020] NZDC 12166.
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2020/330.html