You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
Court of Appeal of New Zealand >>
2020 >>
[2020] NZCA 595
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Wikohika v R [2020] NZCA 595 (26 November 2020)
Last Updated: 1 December 2020
|
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW
ZEALANDI
TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA
|
|
|
BETWEEN
|
HINE WIKOHIKA Appellant
|
|
AND
|
THE QUEEN Respondent
|
Court:
|
French, Woolford and Dunningham JJ
|
Counsel:
|
M J Phelps for Appellant M H Cooke for Respondent
|
Judgment: (On the papers)
|
26 November 2020 at 9 am
|
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
- The
sentence of 12 months’ home detention is confirmed and is to commence on
30 November 2020 on the standard and special conditions
set out at [7].
- Bail
is revoked from 30 November
2020.
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS OF THE COURT
(Given by Woolford J)
- [1] In our
judgment dated 18 August 2020, we quashed Ms Wikohika’s sentence of three
years and four months’ imprisonment
and substituted a sentence of 12
months’ home detention subject to the provision of a suitable address
approved by the Department
of
Corrections.[1] We directed that a
further pre-sentence report under s 26A of the Sentencing Act 2002 be
prepared covering the suitability of the
proposed home detention
address.[2]
- [2] In a report
dated 24 September 2020, the Department of Corrections (the Department)
expressed reservations about the proposed
address. It recommended a further
remand on bail to allow information about new charges faced by Ms Wikohika
to be considered and
the possible implementation of additional support and
oversight for her. In our minute dated 28 September 2020, we deferred the
start
date of the home detention sentence to enable further information to be obtained
about the suitability of the address.
- [3] We received
a supplementary memorandum from the Department of Corrections dated 16 October
2020 in which the Department addressed
questions as to the role the proposed
address played in alleged offending by Ms Wikohika’s partner and the basis
of the new
charges against Ms Wikohika, including provision of the summary
of facts. In our further minute dated 21 October 2020, we sought
further
submissions from counsel regarding the implications of this information for
the sentence appeal.
- [4] We have now
received supplementary submissions of counsel for Ms Wikohika dated
10 November 2020 and a memorandum of counsel for
the Crown dated
16 November 2020. We are most grateful for the valuable assistance
provided by the parties.
- [5] Counsel for
Ms Wikohika maintains that the proposed address is suitable as an address
at which she is able to serve a sentence
of home detention, subject to
the standard conditions and special conditions set out in his
submissions.
- [6] After
consultation with the prosecutor and the officer-in-charge, the Crown confirms
that it is unaware at this stage of grounds
justifying a different approach to
that set out in this Court’s decision of 18 August 2020. The Crown does
not therefore oppose
Ms Wikohika serving a sentence of home detention at the
proposed address.
- [7] Accordingly,
we confirm the sentence of 12 months’ home detention which is to commence
on Monday, 30 November 2020, on the
standard conditions and the following
special conditions. Ms Wikohika is:
(a) to reside at the address
specified in the pre-sentence report dated 24 September 2020 and not move
to any new residential address
without the prior written approval of a probation
officer;
(b) to attend an assessment for Departmental programmes, if health allows, as
directed by a probation officer and to attend and complete
any counselling,
treatment or programme as recommended by the assessment as directed by, and
to the satisfaction of, the probation
officer;
(c) not to possess, consume or use any alcohol or drugs not prescribed to
her;
(d) not to communicate in any way or associate with the persons named in the
proposed special condition No.4 in the pre-sentence report
dated
24 September 2020 without the prior written approval of a probation
officer;
(e) not to communicate in any way or associate with the person named in
[46(v)] of the supplementary submissions of counsel for the
appellant dated 10
November 2020 without the prior written approval of a probation officer; and
(f) not to communicate in any way or associate with any known gang member or
associate, without the prior written approval of a probation
officer.
- [8] Ms Wikohika
has been on bail throughout. Bail is revoked from 30 November
2020.
Solicitors:
Crown Law Office, Wellington
for Respondent
[1] Wikohika v R [2020]
NZCA 352.
[2] At [39].
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2020/595.html