You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
Court of Appeal of New Zealand >>
2021 >>
[2021] NZCA 673
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Johnson v Johnson [2021] NZCA 673 (10 December 2021)
Last Updated: 14 December 2021
|
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW
ZEALANDI
TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA
|
|
|
BETWEEN
|
BONNIE JOHNSON Applicant
|
|
AND
|
DONNA MARIE JOHNSON AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF REGINALD CHARLES
JOHNSON Respondent
|
Court:
|
Gilbert and Goddard JJ
|
Counsel:
|
Applicant in person K G Davenport QC and A E Isaacs for
Respondent
|
Judgment: (On the papers)
|
10 December 2021 at 12 pm
|
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
- The
application for an extension of time to appeal is granted.
- We
direct the Registrar to arrange a telephone conference with the
parties.
- We
make no order as to
costs.
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS OF THE COURT
(Given by Gilbert J)
- [1] Bonnie and
Donna Johnson are the two surviving adult daughters of Reginald Johnson,
who died in September 2003.[1]
Probate was granted in January 2004 and Donna is now the sole remaining
executor of her father’s estate. The estate has been
distributed
with the exception of some bare land at Stewart Street, Helensville (the
property). It only came to light comparatively
recently that this land formed
part of the estate.[2]
- [2] Donna wishes
to sell the property and apply the proceeds to meet the estate’s debts
(including outgoings which she has been
meeting from her own resources) and
distribute the balance to the residuary beneficiaries. However, Bonnie opposes
any sale of the
property. She claims the property is Māori land and does
not form part of her father’s estate. She says she has been
authorised by
the customary owners to live there and did so for many years until recently in
temporary structures she moved onto
the property.
- [3] On 25 March
2021, Associate Judge Bell granted Donna’s application for summary
judgment seeking an order for vacant possession
of the property in her capacity
as executor of the estate.[3] In
granting summary judgment, the Associate Judge concluded it was not reasonably
arguable that the property was Māori customary
land or Māori freehold
land, as asserted by Bonnie.[4] The
title documents showed it was general land to which Donna had indefeasible
title.[5] It followed that
Bonnie’s claimed occupation right sourced from the customary owners was
not legally effective and could not
defeat Donna’s
claim.[6] The order granted Donna
“vacant possession of the property at 21 Stewart Street, Helensville,
with effect from 1 July 2021”
to allow Bonnie time to remove livestock and
temporary structures from the
property.[7] However, Bonnie contends
there is a serious question as to what land is correctly described as
“21 Stewart Street” and
who owns it.
- [4] Bonnie
wishes to exercise her right of appeal against the judgment. She is
unrepresented and says she mistakenly filed her appeal
in the High Court. She
now applies under r 29A of the Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005 for an
extension of time to appeal. The
application for an extension of time was filed
on 19 May 2021.[8] The delay was
comparatively short, has been satisfactorily explained and has caused no
material prejudice to the respondent. An
extension of time should therefore be
granted unless it can safely be concluded at this preliminary stage that the
proposed appeal
has no prospect of success.
- [5] Bonnie
wishes to argue on appeal that the only property remaining in the estate
comprises an area of approximately 200 m2 and is separate from the
land where her temporary structures were located. She says apart from this
small area, the land at 21 Stewart
Street is Māori land. Bonnie has
filed various documents sourced from Archives New Zealand and the local council
in support
of her claim, including historical titles and plans. It is not easy
to reconcile this information (some of which is incomplete and
difficult to
decipher) and relate it to whatever land correlates to the street address
— 21 Stewart Street — the description
of the land provided in
the High Court possession order.
- [6] Bonnie may
face considerable challenges with her appeal, but we do not consider it would be
safe for us to conclude on the information
available that it is clearly
hopeless. For example, it is unclear what Part Lot 16 (which is said to
comprise 21 Stewart Street)
relates to exactly. The High Court judgment records
that Lot 2 in DP82238 is 15 Stewart Street and that 21 Stewart Street is the
property immediately adjoining it, but this is not easily reconciled on the
evidence.[9] If 21 Stewart Street is
beyond the boundaries of Lot 2 then it would appear to form a portion of land
which includes Māori
land with the identifier ML 1581 — a title
cannot be a hybrid of both Māori land and general
land.[10]
- [7] The High
Court judgment also states that there is land beyond 21 Stewart Street under the
record of title NA548/99 with an area
of some 2,808 square
meters.[11] However that title seems
to be a historical reference to NA773/194 which appears to include Lot 2 on
DP82238. The position is further
complicated by the fact that Donna only became
aware of the existence of 21 Stewart Street as a result of a departmental
dealing
in 2010 which raises more potential questions about the exact boundaries
of 21 Stewart Street. There may be arguable issues in relation
to the
identification of the land to which NA773/194 and DP82238 relate, and
whether any Māori land has incorrectly been recently
designated as general
land under Part Lot 16 on NA773/194.
- [8] In all the
circumstances, we consider the appropriate course in the interests of justice is
to grant the extension of time to
enable the appeal to be determined on its
merits.
- [9] We strongly
recommend that Bonnie seeks legal representation for the appeal. Any further
evidence, not before the High Court,
that Bonnie wishes to place before this
Court must be presented in affidavits and be accompanied by an application for
leave to adduce
this evidence. The complex history of the land, and the
possibility that some or all of the land known as 21 Stewart Street is
Māori
land, also raises questions about whether other parties should be
served. We will direct the Registrar to convene a teleconference
to
consider these and any other matters required to ensure the appeal progresses
efficiently. This may include consideration of
whether counsel should be
appointed to assist the Court (as to that possibility, we give no
assurance).
Result
- [10] The
application for an extension of time to appeal is granted.
- [11] The
Registrar is directed to convene a telephone conference with the parties.
- [12] We make no
order as to costs.
Solicitors:
Sellars & Co,
Helensville for Respondent
[1] Reginald Johnson had eight
children. Three predeceased him, one has since died, one is in a dementia
ward and the other is not
involved in this proceeding.
[2] According to an affidavit of
Donna Johnson affirmed on 18 December 2020, this information was discovered in
June 2010 as a result
of a departmental dealing made by Land Information
New Zealand when the land was converted to Landonline.
[3] Johnson v Johnson
[2021] NZHC 624 [High Court judgment].
[4] At [14]–[17].
[5] At [18].
[6] At [18].
[7] At [26(a)].
[8] An unsigned notice of appeal
dated 13 April 2021 was filed in this Court on 29 April 2021. Registry informed
the appellant that
the notice was not compliant. On 19 May 2021 Registry
informed the appellant that the notice of appeal was rejected and an application
for an extension of time would need to be filed if the appellant wanted to
proceed. An unsigned rule 29A application for an extension
of time was received
on 19 May 2021 followed by a signed application on 29 June 2021.
[9] High Court judgment, above n
3, at [10].
[10] Short v Stowers –
Tumu Kaituna 14 Block (2018) 199 Waiariki MB 188 (199 WAR 188) at [32]
citing Paikea – Otara 5D1 (2016) 140 Taitokerau MB 78 (140 TTK 78);
Craig v Kira – Wainui 2F4D (2006) 7 Whangarei Appellate
MB 1 (7 APWH 1) at [28]–[29]; and Management Committee of Mangatawa
Papamoa Blocks – Lot 1 DPS 65413 (2018) 156 Waikato Maniapoto MB 77
(156 WMN 77).
[11] High Court judgment, above
n 3, at [10]–[11].
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2021/673.html