Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
Last Updated: 2 August 2022
|
|
IN THE MATTER OF |
SOLICITOR-GENERAL’S REFERENCE (NO 1 OF 2022) FROM CRI-2021-463-55, HIGH COURT AT ROTORUA |
Court: |
Cooper P and Brown J |
Counsel: |
B J Thompson for Referrer |
Judgment: (On the papers) |
27 July 2022 at 2:30 pm |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
Was the Court correct to find that the issue of producer statements in relation to non-compliant building work does not give rise to liability under s 40 of the Building Act 2004?
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS OF THE COURT
(Given by Cooper P)
Was the Court correct to find that the [issue] of producer statements in relation to non-compliant building work does not give rise to liability under s 40 of the Building Act 2004?
Solicitors:
Crown Law Office, Wellington
for Referrer
[1] Cancian v Tauranga City Council [2022] NZHC 556; and Building Act 2004, ss 40 and 386.
[2] Criminal Procedure Act 2011, s 313(3); and Re Solicitor-General’s Reference (No 1 of 2016) [2016] NZCA 76 at [11]–[17].
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2022/338.html