You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
Court of Appeal of New Zealand >>
2022 >>
[2022] NZCA 358
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Attorney-General v Fleming [2022] NZCA 358 (8 August 2022)
Last Updated: 15 August 2022
|
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW
ZEALANDI
TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA
|
|
|
BETWEEN
|
ATTORNEY-GENERAL Appellant
|
|
AND
|
CHRISTINE FLEMING Respondent
|
Court:
|
Cooper P
|
Counsel:
|
S V McKechnie and T J Bremner for the Appellant P J Dale QC for
Respondent L T Meys as litigation guardian for J C F Anyon-Peters for
Applicant
|
Judgment: (On the papers)
|
8 August 2022 at 2:30 pm
|
JUDGMENT OF COOPER P
- The
application for access to court documents on this Court’s file is granted
so far as it relates to minutes, orders, judgments,
pleadings and submissions.
Counsel for the applicant is required to give an undertaking in the terms set
out at [8].
The application is otherwise
declined.
- There
is no order as to costs.
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS
- [1] The Taikura
Trust has made an application for documents held on the Court’s file in
respect of this appeal, under the Senior
Courts (Access to Court Documents)
(Rules 2017).
- [2] The
documents which are subject to the application are described as:
The
court record and court file ... including: court judgments and minutes,
applications, pleadings, transcripts, evidence, and any
further documents which
are filed in relation to these proceedings.
- [3] The
application states the reasons that the application is made in the following
term:
Our client, Taikura Trust, is a party to similar proceedings
in the Employment Relations Authority which were stayed pending the outcome
of
this proceeding. Although not a party to this proceeding, a senior executive of
Taikura Trust gave evidence in the Employment
Court in this proceeding.
Our client has a vested interest in the progress and outcome of the
proceedings CA371/2021 as it will significantly impact (and perhaps
be
determinative of) the Employment Relations Authority proceedings to which
Taikura Trust is a party.
- [4] The
application contains a statement that the application is advanced on the basis
that there could be an undertaking that any
confidential documents were held
only by counsel and not disclosed to the Trust.
- [5] A similar
application was advanced in the Employment Court, whose judgment has given rise
to the substantive appeal. In that
Court, Chief Judge Inglis ruled the Trust
could have access to minutes, orders and judgments made in the proceedings, but
otherwise
declined the application.[1]
- [6] A similar
application has also been made in an appeal to be heard at the same time as
this, CA742/2021 Director-General of Health v Peter Humphreys.
- [7] In a
judgment delivered today, I have granted the application in that case on a
limited basis, that is that there should be access
to the minutes, orders,
judgments, pleadings and submissions made as the appeal proceeds to hearing, but
there should not be access
to notes of evidence, affidavits, and briefs which
form part of the record as it comes to this Court, because of confidentiality
and privacy issues in respect of personal
information.[2]
- [8] Similar
issues as to confidentiality arise in respect of the person for whom
Mr Meys acts as litigation guardian in this case,
J, and the same outcome
is appropriate. Counsel for the Trust will need to give an undertaking that
confidential information included
as part of the submissions and pleadings will
be held only by counsel and will not be disclosed to the
Trust.
Result
- [9] The
application for access to Court documents on this Court’s file is granted
so far as it relates to minutes, orders, judgments,
pleadings and submissions.
Counsel for the Applicant is required to give an undertaking in the terms set
out at [8]. The application is
otherwise declined.
- [10] There is no
order as to costs.
Solicitors:
Simpson
Grierson, Wellington for Appellant
Oakley Moran, Wellington for
Respondent
Neilsons Lawyers, Auckland for J
Meredith Connell, Auckland
for Applicant
[1] Fleming v
Attorney-General [2022] NZEmpC 110 at [18].
[2] Director-General of Health
v Humphreys [2022] NZCA 359.
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2022/358.html