You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
Court of Appeal of New Zealand >>
2023 >>
[2023] NZCA 421
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Afamasaga v R [2023] NZCA 421 (15 September 2023)
Last Updated: 18 September 2023
|
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW
ZEALANDI
TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA
|
|
|
BETWEEN
|
CALEB AFAMASAGA Applicant
|
|
AND
|
THE KING Respondent
|
Court:
|
Miller and Collins JJ
|
Counsel:
|
Applicant in person Z A Fuhr for Respondent
|
Judgment: (On the papers)
|
15 September 2023 at 9.30 am
|
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The application
to recall judgment [2015] NZCA 615 is
declined.
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS OF THE COURT
(Given by Collins J)
- [1] In 2014 Mr
Afamasaga was convicted of murder and wounding with intent to cause grievous
bodily harm. The offending occurred in
2012 when Mr Afamasaga was a prospect
for membership of the King Cobra gang. The victim was a member of a rival
gang.
- [2] In 2015,
this Court dismissed appeals against conviction and sentence by
Mr Afamasaga and his two
co-offenders.[1] The Supreme Court
declined Mr Afamasaga’s application to extend time for him to apply
for leave to appeal his
conviction.[2]
- [3] Mrs
Afamasaga has now applied on behalf of her husband to have us recall our
judgment, citing what she suggests are differences
between our statement of the
facts and those set out in the sentencing notes of Woolford J, the trial
Judge.[3] Mrs Afamasaga has made
the application because her husband has a long-term brain injury.
- [4] We have
carefully considered Mrs Afamasaga’s submissions, but we cannot grant the
application for recall. There are two
reasons for this.
- [5] The
application for recall does not satisfy the criteria for this Court to recall
its judgment.[4] There is no
indication that failure to correct the alleged error would cause a
“substantial miscarriage of
justice”.[5] Furthermore, there
is no error in [10] of this Court’s judgment, which records the facts
established at the trial and accepted
by Woolford
J.
Result
Solicitors:
Crown Law Office | Te Tari Ture o te Karauna, Wellington
for Respondent
[1] Afamasaga v R [2015]
NZCA 615.
[2] Afamasaga v R [2019]
NZSC 16.
[3] R v Afamasaga [2014]
NZHC 2142.
[4] Uhrle v R [2020] NZSC
62, [2020] 1 NZLR 286 at [25]; and Jolley v R [2022] NZSC 150, [2022]
1 NZLR 595 at [18] and [19].
[5] Uhrle v R, above n 4,
at [25] citing R v Smith [2002] NZCA 335; [2003] 3 NZLR 617 (CA) at [36].
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2023/421.html