Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of New Zealand Decisions |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI 2009-485-107 MATTHEW ANDREW BAXTER v NEW ZEALAND POLICE Hearing: 1 September 2009 Counsel: K I Jefferies for Appellant M Snape for Respondent Judgment: 1 September 2009 JUDGMENT OF SIMON FRANCE J (Bail Appeal) [1] Mr Baxter appeals against a refusal of bail. Current charges [2] Mr Baxter is charged with: a) theft or in the alternative receiving computer and electrical equipment; b) theft of a vehicle; c) burglary and possession of instruments for burglary; MATTHEW ANDREW BAXTER V NEW ZEALAND POLICE HC WN CRI 2009-485-107 1 September 2009 d) supplying methamphetamine; e) supplying, and possession for supply (x3) GBL. [3] He also has pleaded guilty to a single charge of possessing methamphetamine. Bail decision [4] The District Court Judge considered the apparent strength of the evidence, noting that as regards theft/receiving the circumstances were difficult to answer and those charges alone could result in imprisonment. [5] It is noted that Mr Baxter, after some of these charges were laid and on which he obtained bail, was sentenced to three months' imprisonment on a number of unrelated matters, mainly involving breach of bail and other conditions. That sentence will soon be served if it has not already been. [6] The Court noted that between March and May Mr Baxter was effectively on the run, having failed to appear on those other charges. The Court concluded he was a flight risk and that he might offend on bail. Basis for appeal [7] Mr Jefferies submits the Judge erred in his exercise of discretion and failed to consider whether conditions might remove the flight risk. It is submitted the drug offending charges depend on inferences to be drawn from text messages, and the property offending could well be met with a community based sentence. [8] In addition Mr Baxter's parents, who live in Auckland, now offer their home as a bail address. The one early proffered has been seen as unsuitable. [9] Mr Baxter is soon to stand trial on the burglary and property offending. However, depositions are still to be held on the drugs charges and the delay to trial is likely to be lengthy. Decision [10] Mr Baxter faces a number of charges involving allegations of both property and drug offending. He has twenty-nine previous convictions, two of which are failure to answer bail, and three of which are breach of community sentences. He was in possession of a police scanner. His text messages reveals an apparent belief on his part of his cleverness in avoiding the police and eluding curfews. Numerous warrants to arrest for failing to appear have had to be issued. Mr Baxter, when arrested, told police that in March he had seen police coming and had escaped out of a window. He then avoided police till his arrest in May. He has previously offended while on bail. [11] Mr Baxter was sentenced to short jail terms in April 2008 and June 2009. The present charges focus primarily on October to December 2008, including the alleged drug dealing. There is a clear picture of someone who has committed himself to a life outside the law. Whilst the present matters are only allegations of offending, there is plainly a body of evidence to confront. Further, his past conduct leaves little room for manoeuvre. I see no basis at all why society should be exposed to any more risk than it need be, and consider suggestions by Mr Baxter that he would respect conditions of bail as not credible. [12] Bail was rightly declined by the District Court and the appeal is dismissed. __________________________ Simon France J Solicitors: K I Jefferies, Jefferies Raizis, PO Box 10641, Wellington, email: jrlaw@xtra.co.nz M Snape, Luke Cunningham & Clere, PO Box 10357, Wellington, email: mws@lcc.co.nz
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2009/1157.html