Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of New Zealand Decisions |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI 2008-092-17198 THE QUEEN v KORO PUTUA Charge: Supplying methamphetamine (representative) Plea: Guilty Appearances: David Johnstone for Crown Geoffrey Wells for Prisoner Sentenced: 22 September 2009 2 years imprisonment (with conditions on release) SENTENCING NOTES OF HARRISON J _________________________________________________________________________________ SOLICITORS Meredith Connell (Auckland) for Crown Geoff Wells (Auckland) for Prisoner R V PUTUA HC AK CRI 2008-092-17198 22 September 2009 Introduction [1] Mr Putua, you have pleaded guilty to a representative count of supplying methamphetamine on or between 12 February 2008 and 5 May 2008. You know that the maximum sentence that can be imposed is one of life imprisonment. That is a reflection of the way society considers this type of offending. Facts [2] The facts are straightforward. In late 2007 the police conducted an investigation into the drug dealing activities of two gangs one was the Killer Beez and the other was the Tribesmen. The investigation focused on the Counties- Manukau region. The police intercepted over 110,000 telephone communications during a three month period. [3] Among the communications they intercepted were 294 between you and those who are known drug dealers. In particular there was Mr Joshua Masters, who was allegedly the mastermind of this operation, Mr Max Wilson and Mr Morten Moungatonga. The last two have pleaded guilty to offending. [4] The police determined that 34 of the telephone and text messages between you and the other three were related to drug dealing. The communications provided overwhelming evidence that you were operating on behalf of Mr Masters in selling or supplying methamphetamine. You were accountable to Mr Masters for the proceeds of sale. [5] The police have been unable to work out the exact amount of drugs that you supplied on Mr Masters' behalf or at his behest. However, they were satisfied that on each occasion you were dealing in relatively small units. As a result the police have concluded that you supplied between four and five grams of methamphetamine, and you will be sentenced on that basis. Starting Point [6] Against that brief factual background I must set the starting point for your sentence. The starting point is the term of imprisonment appropriate for the offending before I take into account your personal circumstances. [7] I do not need to emphasise to you, Mr Putua, the evil nature of dealing in methamphetamine. You know because you would have seen the destruction that it brings to users, their whanau and their wider friends. Your realisation of that damage is apparent from the letter that you have kindly written to me. [8] Mr Johnstone, who appears today for the Crown, has provided a full written synopsis of submissions. I am particularly appreciative of his summary of comparative sentences imposed both in this Court and the District Court on some co- offenders. In total there were, I think, 64 people arrested as a result of the operation. [9] In particular I have considered the sentence of two years and six months imposed by Priestley J upon Ms Flavell: R v Flavell HC AK CRI 2008-092-7352 21 November 2008. She has pleaded guilty to supplying just under six grams of methamphetamine. Priestley J adopted a starting point of four years and three months. Also I have considered the sentences imposed in this Court by Lang J in the cases of Wilson and Te Wani: R v Wilson HC AK CRI 2008-092-17198 30 June 2009; R v Te Wani HC AK CRI 2008-092-17198 30 June 2009. And also the decisions of Wylie J dismissing three appeals from sentences imposed by Judge Blackie in the District Court at Manukau: Phillips v Police HC AK CRI 2009-404- 214 18 August 2009; George v Police HC AK CRI 2009-404-218 19 August 2009; Vesetalu v Police HC AK CRI 2009-404-213 18 August 2009. [10] Finally, I am particularly influenced by the sentence of two years and two months imposed by Ronald Young J in this Court: R v Morunga HC AK CRI 2008- 092-17198 18 September 2009. Ms Morunga pleaded guilty to supplying methamphetamine in the range of five to seven grams. Ronald Young J adopted a starting point of three years and three months. Mercifully to Ms Morunga, he did not adjust that starting point upwards to take account of her previous drug dealing. [11] I am satisfied that an appropriate starting point for you, Mr Putua, is three years imprisonment. I am not going to adjust that starting point upwards to take account of your previous offending. It is unrelated to serious drug dealing. Mitigation [12] Against that starting point, I take into account mitigating factors. First and foremost there is your plea of guilty. It must be given an appropriate credit. It is an acknowledgement of your remorse for your wrongdoing. You accept that you are accountable to society. You have saved the State the cost and inconvenience of a trial. [13] Mr Putua, you are aged 31 years. You have an unfortunate criminal history dating back to Youth Court days. Unfortunately you have had an ongoing association with the so-called gangs in South Auckland. The probation officer assesses you as presenting a high risk of re-offending unless you are able to break the chains of your association with your past associates and gang members. That will not be easy. [14] However, I understand from your correspondence that you want to do what you can to start a new life. You know that if you do not turn a corner today you are going to be coming back to this Court and you are going to be sentenced to increasing terms of imprisonment. You have actually been in custody for 15 months on this charge. On my assessment, on a time served basis, you have completed the equivalent of a term of at least two-and-a-half years imprisonment. [15] Mr Putua, I am impressed by the letter you have written me. Also I am moved by the letter of support from Mrs Witehira. She is the mother of your partner. She is prepared to offer you all the support she can if you shift into the Gisborne region. She is obviously a person of high standing in the community. If you are prepared to take the opportunity, I am in no doubt that she could assist in your rehabilitation. Also I take account of the fact that you now realise your children are at risk, largely as a result of your own criminality and lack of attention. Furthermore, I am appreciative, as always, of the submissions made on your behalf by Mr Wells today. [16] In these circumstances I sentence you to a term of two years imprisonment. On release you are to be subject to the conditions set out in the probation report for a period of six months. For the avoidance of doubt, I repeat them in open Court today: (1) You are to undertake a Mäori cultural assessment and if deemed suitable to attend and complete any programme to the satisfaction of the supervising probation officer and programme provider; (2) You are to undertake and complete any other such counselling programmes as directed by the supervising probation officer; (3) You are to undertake and complete a departmental rehabilitation programme and abide by the rules of the programme to the satisfaction of the programme provider and probation officer; (4) You are not to associate with any member of the Tribesmen gang or the Killer Beez gang, either directly or indirectly. [17] You understand those conditions. I am impressed by your willingness to participate in those programmes. If you take that chance, Mr Putua, I wish you well. Please stand down. ______________________________________ Rhys Harrison J
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2009/1314.html