Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of New Zealand Decisions |
Last Updated: 11 August 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
CIV-2010-485-2518
UNDER Sections 292, 293 and 294 of the
Companies Act 1993
BETWEEN JOHN HOWARD FISK AND CRAIG ALEXANDER SANSON
Plaintiffs
AND DAVID LAURENCE MAHONEY First Defendant
AND MICHAEL DAVID MAHONEY AND TRACEY LEE MAHONEY
Second Defendants
Hearing: 1 June 2011
(Heard at Wellington)
Counsel: R.J. Gordon - Counsel for Plaintiffs
R.C. Laurenson - Counsel for Defendants
Judgment: 1 June 2011
ORAL JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE D.I. GENDALL
Solicitors: Buddle Findlay, Solicitors, PO Box 2694, Wellington
Harkness Law Limited, Solicitors, PO Box 342, Wellington
JH FISK AND CA SANSON V DL MAHONEY HC WN CIV-2010-485-2518 1 June 2011
Introduction
[1] Before the Court are applications by the plaintiffs first to set-aside a transaction said to be an insolvent transaction involving the first defendant and secondly to set-aside a charge said to be a voidable charge involving the second defendants.
[2] The plaintiffs are the liquidators of Jouer Money Limited (in liq) which company was placed into liquidation by order of this Court on 23 November 2009.
[3] Having considered submissions from counsel for the plaintiffs and counsel for the defendants and having considered the present applications before the Court, the defendants’ Notice of Opposition and all supporting material I am satisfied that the applications by the plaintiffs should be granted.
[4] That said the following orders are now made:
(a) An order is now made setting aside the subject transaction in this proceeding between the first defendant, David Laurence Mahoney and Jouer Money Limited (in liq) being a payment of $177,399.76 made by Jouer Money Limited to the first defendant, David Laurence Mahoney (out of the proceeds of the sale of Jouer Money Limited’s property at 314 Queens Drive, Lyall Bay, Wellington) on or about 15
May 2009.
(b) A further order is made that the first defendant, David Laurence Mahoney, is to pay to Jouer Money Limited (in liq) a sum equal to the sum that Jouer Money Limited (in liq) paid to him under the transaction in question namely $177,399.76 within 5 working days of today, that is by 8 June 2011.
(c) The first defendant, David Laurence Mahoney, is also to pay to Jouer
Money Limited (in liq) interest on the said sum of $177,399.76 from
the date of the transaction being 15 May 2009 up to the date of actual payment by him of this sum at the prescribed rate of 8.4% per annum pursuant to s 87(1) Judicature Act 1908.
(d) In addition, an order is now made setting aside the subject charge in this proceeding between the second defendants, Michael David Mahoney and Tracey Lee Mahoney and Jouer Money Limited (in liq) being the security interest referred to in the financing statement numbered FR6V29X1MH920286 registered on the Personal Property Security Register on Monday, 23 November 2009 at 9.45 am and asserted to be a charge in favour of the second defendants over all present and after acquired personal property of Jouer Money Limited (in liq).
(e) In addition, costs on a Category 2B basis together with disbursements as approved by the Registrar are awarded to the plaintiffs with respect to the present applications against the first defendant and the second defendants.
[5] My detailed reasons for this decision will follow.
‘Associate Judge D.I. Gendall’
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2011/835.html