Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of New Zealand Decisions |
Last Updated: 23 June 2014
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
CRI-2011-004-021256 [2014] NZHC 183
THE QUEEN
v
SUMIT CARRIK NARAYAN
Charge:
Plea:
|
Sexual violation (4); Aggravated robbery (2);
Attempted sexual violation; Indecent assault
Not Guilty
|
Counsel:
|
K Raftery for Crown
MW Ryan for Prisoner
|
Sentenced:
|
18 February 2014
|
SENTENCING NOTES OF BREWER
J
Solicitors/Counsel: Meredith Connell (Auckland) for Crown
Mark Ryan (Auckland) for Prisoner
R v NARAYAN [2014] NZHC 183 [18 February 2014]
Introduction
[1] Mr Narayan, you appear for sentence today on the following
charges:
(a) Two counts of aggravated robbery – the maximum period of
imprisonment for each charge is 14 years;
(b) Four counts of sexual violation – the maximum period of
imprisonment for each of those offences is 20 years;
(c) Attempted sexual violation – the maximum period of imprisonment
is
10 years; and
(d) Indecent assault – the maximum period of imprisonment is seven
years.
[2] I will set out the facts briefly and for the record. You went to
trial, of course, and I heard the evidence, as did you.
Facts
[3] You are here for sentence on offending which took place on 27
December
1997. Your principal victim was a young prostitute who had just
finished entertaining a client in her car. You came
up alongside the vehicle
and you shot the client with a stun gun which incapacitated him. You told the
prostitute to stay in the
car, saying that you had a gun. You warned her not to
run anywhere.
[4] You made the client get out of the car, take his pants off and lie
face down on the ground. You demanded and took the client’s
wallet and
the prostitute’s bag. You ordered the prostitute out of the car and made
her lie down on the ground next to the
client. You then threw the client’s
car keys away and told him to depart.
[5] You then took the prostitute to another car park. On the way there you made her lie on the ground and you touched her pubic area. You put a pair of shorts over her head and led her to a nearby car. You put her in the passenger seat and you drove
off with her, driving for about five to 10 minutes. Needless to say, your
victim was terrified.
[6] You took her to a secluded place and you made her get out of the
car. She still had the shorts over her head. You made
her lie on the ground
and take her clothes off. You then penetrated her anus and vagina with your
finger for a brief period. You
tried unsuccessfully to put your penis into her
anus and you then made her suck your penis. You got her to roll over and this
time
you succeeded in inserting your penis into her anus causing her pain. You
used a condom and when you had finished you discarded
the condom.
[7] You threatened the prostitute. You told her to say, if she was
asked, that she had been assaulted by a client. You told
her that if she told
anyone you would shoot her and you said you knew where she lived. You then let
her go.
[8] It took a long time to link you to this offending, and that was
only as the result of advances in DNA testing.
Pre-sentence report
[9] I have read the pre-sentence report and, as I will come to, the
most relevant factor I have to consider in your sentencing
is your number of
convictions.
[10] In 2002, you were sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment for four
charges of unlawful sexual connection, one of attempted
unlawful sexual
connection, and two charges of aggravated robbery. That offending occurred
after the offending for which I have
to sentence you today. In effect, the
offending for which I have to sentence you today was your first offending and
you were only,
I think, 19 years old at the time.
[11] What is particularly worrying in the pre-sentence report is that you are assessed to be at a high risk of further violent sexual offending. The report says you lack insight into your offending, you lack concern for your victims, you are impulsive, you have an interest in deviant sexual practices, and you have a possible personality disorder.
[12] You say that you do not recall the offending for which you are now
to be
sentenced, other than to say that you recall having had sex with “a
girl”.
[13] I note that you have been waitlisted for the Adult Sex Offender
Treatment Programme since 2006 but, as Mr Ryan has confirmed,
you have not been
permitted to attend that programme.
Starting point
[14] In sentencing you, I have to fix a start point which takes into
account what you actually did. I then have to adjust the
start point by taking
into account your personal circumstances.
[15] I have read the cases cited to me by the lawyers. There is another
case, which I referred to a moment ago when discussing
your situation
with your lawyer, Mr Ryan. That is the case of R v Tonihi, decided in
2011.1 That involved an attack on a prostitute, and I found
that case to be helpful.
[16] Looking at all of the cases and comparing them to your situation, I
find that a start point for your sexual offending in
this case should be 11
years’ imprisonment.
[17] I also have to consider the other charges, particularly the
aggravated robbery charges. Given that the offending against
the client
involved the use of a stun gun and there was degrading conduct in addition, in
my view that offending alone would justify
a start point of at least four
years’ imprisonment.
[18] However, I have to take into account that this was a single, if prolonged, incident which started in the car park when you attacked the client and the prostitute and finished some period later when you released the prostitute. Therefore, I stand back and look at the totality of that incident and I adopt an overall start point of
14 years’ imprisonment.
1 R v Tonihi HC Christchurch CRI-2010-009-17567, 6 July 2011.
Personal circumstances
[19] I now have to adjust that overall starting point by
looking at your circumstances.
[20] You were 19 years old at the time of the offending and, as I said,
this was your first offending.
[21] The sentencing purposes and principles of promoting in you a sense of
responsibility and emphasising rehabilitation and
reintegration would have
been strong factors had you been sentenced shortly after the offending. But you
were not. You went on
to offend in similar and very serious ways.
[22] In 2002, you were sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment. You
have been in custody since 2000. That is a circumstance
in your life which I
must consider very carefully.
[23] The law says that I must consider the totality of your position. I
cannot just sentence you to 14 years’ imprisonment.
That would fail to
take into account that this was the first offending in what became a series of
offending for which you have been
sentenced already.
[24] In my view, if this offending had been included in the charges on
which you were sentenced in 2002, the overall sentence
would have been
20 to 22 years’ imprisonment. I agree in this respect with the
submission of your lawyer, Mr Ryan. In
other words, a further five to
seven years’ imprisonment would have been imposed upon
you.
[25] My task is not to attempt to put you in the very same position as you would have been back in 2002 had your 1997 offending been included. It was not and there has now, in 2013, been a separate trial. I am aware of the ongoing effects your offending has had on your victim. They are very serious effects. But I do have to ensure that what I sentence you to now is not disproportional having regard to the
2002 sentencing.
[26] Accordingly, I am going to reduce the start point of 14 years’
imprisonment to seven years’ imprisonment. This
will be cumulative with
your current sentence.
Minimum period of imprisonment
[27] I am also going to order that you serve a minimum period of
imprisonment. I consider that the circumstances of your offending
are so
exceptional that this is justified.2
[28] I will not repeat the facts. However, I consider the premeditation,
the use of a stun gun and the degrading treatment of
both victims to be
relevant. So too is your state of mind and your psychology.
[29] Mr Narayan, having seen you give evidence at your trial, I fully
understand the comments that have been made by the author
of the pre-sentence
report. I judge you to be a dangerous man. If I could, I would sentence you to
preventive detention. But I
cannot. You were too young at the time of the
offending. Your offending was contributed to by a disturbing sexual motivation.
You
lack remorse and empathy and you are at, as I have said, a high risk of
re-offending even after 14 years in prison.
[30] I will impose a minimum period of imprisonment of four
years.
Sentence
[31] Mr Narayan, on each of the four lead counts of sexual violation, you
are sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment.
[32] On the count of attempted sexual violation, you are sentenced to
three years’
imprisonment.
[33] On each of the two counts of aggravated robbery, you are sentenced
to four
years’ imprisonment.
2 Criminal Justice Act 1985, s 80.
[34] On the count of indecent assault, you are sentenced to three
years’
imprisonment.
[35] These terms will be served concurrently with each other, meaning the
total
sentence to be served is one of seven years’ imprisonment.
[36] You will serve a minimum period of imprisonment of four years. [37] You
may stand down.
Brewer J
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2014/183.html