NZLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of New Zealand Decisions

You are here:  NZLII >> Databases >> High Court of New Zealand Decisions >> 2014 >> [2014] NZHC 582

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

K v Immigration and Protection Tribunal [2014] NZHC 582 (26 March 2014)

Last Updated: 16 December 2014


IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY



CIV 2013-404-3520 [2014] NZHC 582

BETWEEN
K
Plaintiff
AND
IMMIGRATION AND PROTECTION TRIBUNAL
First Defendant
AND
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT Second Defendant


Hearing:
26 March 2014
Counsel:
Plaintiff in Person
R E Savage for Second Respondent
Judgment:
26 March 2014




JUDGMENT OF SIMON FRANCE J



[1] K seeks to review a decision of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal declining his application for protected person status. Pursuant to s 249(1B) of the Immigration Act 2009, leave of this Court is required to bring such proceedings.

[2] The second defendant seeks security for costs in the sum of $5,000. It bases this on the extensive history of litigation Mr K has embarked upon since he first claimed refugee status in 2008. As a consequence cost orders to date of $19,860.83

have been made. Of this $200 has been paid.











K v IMMIGRATION AND PROTECTION TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHC 582 [26 March 2014]

[3] Mr K appeared in person. He stressed the importance of the proceedings to him, the international recognition of the importance of access to courts on refugee matters and his current inability to pay. Mr K has a wife and child in Australia and any money he has goes to them.

[4] The application by the second respondent is fairly brought. However, because an order for security would determine the matter, and because only one hour will be needed to hear a leave application, and the necessary documentation is already before the Court, I intend to decline the application. It can be revisited if leave to review is granted.

[5] The following timetable applies:

(a) Mr K is to file his submissions by 25 April. He is directed to s 249(1C) of the Act which sets out the criteria to be addressed;

(b) the second defendant is to file by 16 May 2014;

(c) a one hour fixture to be allocated as soon as possible after that.











Simon France J

Solicitors:

Meredith Connell, Crown Solicitors, Auckland


NZLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2014/582.html