Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of New Zealand Decisions |
Last Updated: 26 August 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
CIV-2015-404-1838 [2015] NZHC 1961
IN THE MATTER
|
of the Trustee Act 1956 and the inherent
jurisdiction of the High Court to supervise trusts
|
IN THE MATTER
|
the Roy Kohlhase Family Trust, the Elizabeth Kohlhase Family Trust and
R&E Kohlhase Family Trust
|
BETWEEN
|
LISTON TRUSTEE SERVICES LIMITED, JENNIFER MARY MCGILL AND DONALD WILLIAM
MCMORLAND AS TRUSTEES OF THE ROY KOHLHASE FAMILY TRUST,
THE ELIZABETH KOHLHASE FAMILY TRUST AND R&E KOHLHASE
FAMILY TRUST Plaintiff
|
AND
|
ELIZABETH ALMA KOHLHASE Defendant
|
Hearing:
|
On the papers
|
Date:
|
18 August 2015
|
JUDGMENT OF THOMAS J
This judgment was delivered by me on 18 August 2015 at 4.00 pm pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Date:...............................
LISTON TRUSTEE SERVICES LIMITED, MCGILL AND MCMORLAND AS TRUSTEES OF THE ROY
KOHLHASE FAMILY TRUST, THE ELIZABETH KOHLHASE FAMILY
TRUST AND R&E KOHLHASE
FAMILY TRUST v KOHLHASE [2015] NZHC 1961 [18 August 2015]
[1] The plaintiffs, Liston Trustee Services Ltd, Ms Jennifer
McGill and Mr Donald McMorland, are trustees of the Roy
Kohlhase Family Trust,
the Elizabeth Kohlhase Family Trust and the R & E Kohlhase Family Trust (the
Trusts).
[2] They have applied for a vesting order under s 52 of the Trustee Act
1956 to vest the properties owned by the Trusts (the
Trust property) in the
plaintiffs as current trustees. This order is required because the Trust
property needs to be sold to provide
an income for the monthly costs of care for
the defendant, Mrs Kohlhase, at the Aranui Home & Hospital.
[3] The trustees of the Roy Kohlhase Family Trust and Elizabeth Kohlhase Family Trust jointly own two residential properties at Ocean Beach Road, Mount Maunganui, described as Lot 1 and Lot 2 Deposited Plan 333269 comprised in certificate of title 136477 and 136478. The trustees of the R & E Kohlhase Family Trust own a property at Silverton Avenue, Glen Innes, described as Lot 163
Deposited Plan 41243 comprised in certificate of title NA1902/72.
[4] The R & E Kohlhase Family Trust was established by deed on 4
December
2007. Mr and Mrs Kohlhase were settlors of the Trust and they requested
Liston Trustee Services Ltd to act alongside them as trustee.
On 11 December
2007, Mr Kohlhase exercised his powers under cl 13(a) of the Roy Kohlhase Family
Trust1 and Mrs Kohlhase exercised her power under cl 13(a) of the
Elizabeth Kohlhase Family Trust2 to appoint Liston Trustee Services
Ltd as a trustee of both trusts.
[5] Mr Kohlhase died on 5 May 2013. Following Mr Kohlhase’s death, Mrs Kohlhase and Liston Trustee Services Ltd were the remaining trustees of the Trusts. Mrs Kohlhase ceased to be a trustee on 4 March 20133 because she was declared incapable of managing her property affairs. Thus Liston Trustee Services Ltd
became the only continuing and capable trustee of the
Trusts.
1 Mr Kohlhase is the settlor in the Deed of Trust.
2 Mrs Kohlhase is the settlor in the Deed of Trust.
3 Pursuant to ss 97(5) and 99D of the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988.
[6] Clause 14 in each of the Trusts’ deeds requires that the
number of trustees remain more than one. The appointment
of new trustees could
not be made in accordance with the Trusts’ deeds.4 Pursuant
to s 43 of the Trustee Act, Liston Trustee Services Ltd on 24 June 2015
appointed Ms Gill and Mr McMorland as new trustees
of the Trusts by way of
deeds.
[7] Despite being replaced as trustees, the certificates of
title to the Trust property specify the registered proprietors
as Mr and Mrs
Kohlhase, because they were trustees of the Trusts at the time the property was
acquired, and Liston Trustee Services
Ltd.
[8] A Mr Laurenson was appointed by the Family Court as Mrs
Kohlhase’s property manager5 on 30 April 2015 and as her
welfare guardian6 on 14 July 2015. Mr Laurenson does not have the
power to deal with the Trust property on behalf of Mrs Kohlhase. Thus the
trustees
of the Trusts are prevented from dealing with the Trust
property.
[9] The plaintiffs apply for vesting orders in order to enable
the proper management of the Trust property. The affidavit
of the sole
director and shareholder of Liston Trustee Services Ltd, Mr Snedden, highlights
that the matter is urgent due to the
outstanding residential fees owed to Aranui
Home & Hospital in relation to Mrs Kohlhase’s care.
[10] Mr Laurenson does not oppose the proceedings on behalf of Mrs
Kohlhase. In his affidavit of 7 August 2015, he says he believes
it is in Mrs
Kohlhase’s best interest, as a beneficiary of the Trusts, that the
Trust property is vested in the trustees.
[11] In the circumstances, I am satisfied the vesting orders sought
are appropriate.
5 Pursuant to s 31 of the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988.
6 Pursuant to s 12 of the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988.
Orders
[12] I accept the plaintiffs’ submission that this is an
appropriate case for service on the defendant to be dispensed with
as it would
serve “no useful purpose”7 in the circumstances of this
case.
[13] I make an order vesting in the plaintiffs the properties at Ocean
Beach Road, Mount Maunganui, described as Lot 1 and Lot
2 Deposited Plan 333269
comprised in certificate of title 136477 and 136478 and the property at
Silverton Avenue, Glen Innes, described
as Lot 163 Deposited Plan 41243
comprised in certificate of title NA1902/72.
[14] The costs associated with this application are to be met from the
funds of the
Trusts.
Thomas
J
7 Docherty v Docherty [2013] NZHC 1885 at [33]. Cited with approval in Grazier v Grazier [2014] NZHC 3058 at [14], noting that the source of jurisdiction to dispense with service lies within the inherent jurisdiction of the Court to regulate the process and proceedings of the Court.
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2015/1961.html