Sullivan v Wellsford Properties Limited [2018] NZHC 806 (26 April 2018)

Last Updated: 22 May 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WHANGAREI REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA WHANGĀREI TERENGA PARĀOA ROHE

CIV-2016-488-35 [2018] NZHC 806

BETWEEN	PETER ANTHONY SULLIVAN First Plaintiff PORT ALBERT INVESTMENTS LIMITED Second Plaintiff
AND	WELLSFORD PROPERTIES LIMITED First Defendant GARRY EDWARD HANNAM Second Defendant SUMPTER BAUGHEN CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS LIMITED (Discontinued) Third Defendant

Hearing:	On the papers
Counsel:	P Dale and A Steel for the Plaintiffs J Golightly and D Reeves for the Defendants
Judgment:	26 April 2018

JUDGMENT OF GORDON J

[Costs on application for stay of costs award pending appeal]

This judgment was delivered by me

on 26 April 2018 at 3.30 pm, pursuant to r 11.5 of the High Court Rules

Registrar/Deputy Registrar Date:

Solicitors: Stafford Klaassen, Epsom, Auckland

Marsden Woods Inskip Smith, Whangarei McElroys, Auckland

Counsel P J Dale, Auckland

SULLIVAN v WELLSFORD PROPERTIES LIMITED [2018] NZHC 806 [26 April 2018]

[1] In my judgment of 18 April 2018,¹ I refused the plaintiffs’ application for an order staying execution of my costs judgment.² The plaintiffs sought the stay on the condition that the costs of $87,997.97 awarded to the first and second defendants be held in an interest-bearing deposit in the first defendant’s solicitor’s trust account pending the plaintiffs’ appeal against my substantive judgment³ (or, alternatively, other nominated events).

[2] The first and second defendants proposed that $57,997.97 of the costs awarded should remain in their solicitor’s trust account pending determination of the appeal, with the remaining $30,000 to be released to them. My order on the stay application was to that effect.⁴
[3] The first and second defendants made their proposal in [2] above prior to the plaintiffs filing their application. In my judgment of 18 April 2018, I awarded costs on the unsuccessful stay application to the first and second defendants.⁵
[4] The parties have now filed a joint memorandum setting out agreed costs of
$4,683.00, together with disbursements of $110.00, making a total $4,793.00.

[5] I am satisfied that the two steps taken by the first and second defendants as recorded in the memorandum were required and were taken. The time claimed and the rate for that time are appropriately recorded in the joint memorandum, as is the amount for disbursements.

[6] I award the sum of $4,793.00, being the total of costs and disbursements, in favour of the first and second defendants against the first and second plaintiffs.

[7] The Registrar may seal a costs order in that sum.




Gordon J

¹ Sullivan v Wellsford Properties Ltd [2018] NZHC 708.

² Sullivan v Wellsford Properties Ltd [2018] NZHC 129.

³ Sullivan v Wellsford Properties Ltd [2017] NZHC 3047.

⁴ Sullivan v Wellsford Properties Ltd, above n 1, at [42].

⁵ At [43].