You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of New Zealand Decisions >>
2020 >>
[2020] NZHC 1920
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Hynds Pipe Systems Limited v Ord [2020] NZHC 1920 (3 August 2020)
Last Updated: 6 August 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE
|
CIV-2019-409-498 [2020] NZHC 1920
|
UNDER
|
the Insolvency Act 2006
|
AND
|
|
IN THE MATTER
|
of the bankruptcy of Kyle Stephen Ord
|
BETWEEN
|
HYNDS PIPE SYSTEMS LIMITED
Judgment Creditor
|
AND
|
KYLE STEPHEN ORD
Judgment Debtor
|
Hearing:
|
On the papers
|
Counsel:
|
P A Sheat for Judgment Creditor
Mr K S Ord (self-represented) Judgment Debtor
|
Judgment:
|
3 August 2020
|
JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE LESTER
This judgment was
delivered by me on 3 August 2020 at 12.30pm pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High
Court Rules
Registrar/Deputy Registrar 3 August 2020
HYNDS PIPE SYSTEMS LIMITED v ORD [2020] NZHC 1920 [3 August
2020]
- [1] This
application by the judgment creditor, Hynds Pipe Systems Ltd, to bankrupt the
judgment debtor, Kyle Ord, was filed in November
2019.
- [2] An affidavit
of service was sworn by a process server on 21 January 2020, confirming that the
application for adjudication, summons
to judgment debtor and supporting
affidavit were served personally on the judgment debtor on 18
November 2019.
The affidavit says the summons to debtor showed a hearing date of
7 February 2020. In fact the relevant List date at which the application
was to
be called was 4 February 2020. When the matter was called on 4 February 2020,
there was no appearance for the judgment creditor
or the judgment
debtor.
- [3] When the
matter was called on 4 February 2020, it was adjourned to 20 February
2020 and I directed that the judgment
debtor be advised of the adjourned hearing
date.
- [4] Accordingly,
the situation is that the judgment debtor is aware of the bankruptcy
proceedings, albeit that the proceedings when
served, showed an incorrect first
call date. As far as I can tell from the court file, the judgment debtor has
made no contact with
the court and the judgment creditor reports no
contact.
- [5] The
practical difficulty is that the judgment debtor no longer resides at the
address where the papers were originally served.
The process server’s
affidavit filed in support of the application for substituted service records
that upon his revisiting
the address, the property appeared to have been damaged
by a house fire and no one was residing there.
- [6] The process
server deposes as to attempting service at other addresses that, presumably, his
research suggested were possible
addresses for the judgment debtor, but without
success.
- [7] The judgment
creditor is left in the position that it now has to apply for substituted
service in respect of having to give notice
to the judgment debtor of the next
hearing date.
- [8] I am
satisfied that the judgment creditor has taken reasonable steps to serve the
judgment debtor with the correct date of the
next call of the bankruptcy
application, which has been adjourned while the judgment creditor attempts
service on the judgment debtor.
- [9] This
proceeding is presently to be called in the List on Thursday
6 August 2020. I vacate that call, given that substituted service
cannot be completed within time for that date to be
practical.
- [10] The
proceeding is adjourned to Thursday 20 August 2020 at 10.00 am to
allow substituted service to be completed and the judgment creditor is to ensure
that the enlarged date is recorded in the documents
to be served and in the
advertisement to be placed in the Public Notices section of the
newspaper.
- [11] Accordingly,
I direct:
(i) Personal service on the judgment debtor with the judgment
creditor’s application for adjudication, summons to debtor showing
a
hearing date of 20 August 2020 at 10am at the Christchurch High Court, and the
affidavit in support of the judgment creditor’s
application (the
documents) is dispensed with.
(ii) Service upon the judgment debtor will be deemed to be
effected upon the completion of the following three events:
(a) service of the documents is to be effected by attaching a
copy of the documents, together with a copy of this judgment, in
a sealed
envelope marked “Confidential” addressed to the judgment debtor,
to be placed in the mail box
of 10 Woodend Road, Woodend;
(b) by advertising in the Public Notices section of The Press
newspaper;
(c) by the judgment creditor sending a text message to any mobile number the
judgment creditor has for the judgment debtor, advising
that the documents
have been delivered to 10 Woodend Rd, Woodend, pursuant to an order for
substituted service and
that the bankruptcy application is to be called in the
Christchurch High Court on Thursday 20 August 2020 at 10am.
Associate Judge Lester
Solicitors:
Akarana Legal, Panmure
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2020/1920.html