You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of New Zealand Decisions >>
2022 >>
[2022] NZHC 1259
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Estate of Samuels v Moulder [2022] NZHC 1259 (1 June 2022)
Last Updated: 9 June 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE
|
|
IN THE ESTATE OF
|
PATARI SAMUELS (deceased)
|
AND
|
P P Moulder Applicant
|
Hearing:
|
30 May 2022
|
Counsel:
|
K B Osborne for Applicant
|
Judgment:
|
1 June 2022
|
JUDGMENT OF CHURCHMAN J
- [1] Riwia
Olive Watene of Gisborne (Riwia), caregiver, and Areta Tapatu of Wandong,
Victoria, Australia, house manager (Areta) are
daughters of the late Patari
Samuels (the deceased).
- [2] The
deceased’s Will dated 4 May 1995 appointed his wife, Areta Samuels as
executor but if she did not survive him then appointed
Riwia and Areta who were
incorrectly named in the Will as Olive Rewia Watene and Areta Rita
Tapatu.
- [3] The deceased
died on or about 5 June 2020. Areta Samuels predeceased him having died on 6
March 2003.
- [4] In the
affidavit to lead grant of probate, Riwia and Areta have explained why the
spelling of their names in the Will of the deceased
is different to their legal
names.
- [5] Probate of
the Will was granted by the Registrar under r 27.14 of the High Court Rules 2016
on 9 September 2020.
ESTATE OF PATARI SAMUELS v MOULDER [2022] NZHC 1259 [31 May 2022]
- [6] By
application dated 25 March 2022, Pare Pollyann Moulder, a daughter of the
deceased (Pare), and someone named in his Will as
a beneficiary, applied to the
Court for an order that Riwia and Areta, as administrators of the estate, file
the following documents:
(a) an accurate inventory of the estate; and
(b) an account of the estate that–
(i) is accurate; and
(ii) states the dates and details of all receipts and disbursements; and
(iii) states which of the receipts and disbursements were on capital account and
which were on revenue account.
- [7] Pare filed a
supporting affidavit which details discrepancies between information provided by
Riwia and Areta and other documentation
in relation to payments that had been
made from the estate. She also deposes that accounts that she had paid on behalf
of the estate,
and in respect of which she sought reimbursement, have not been
paid.
- [8] The
application and supporting affidavit were served on Riwia and Areta on 7 May
2022. No notice of opposition to the application
has been filed.
- [9] The contents
of the affidavit of the applicant satisfy me that this is an appropriate case
for Riwia and Areta to provide the
information requested, and accordingly I
grant the application in the terms sought.
Churchman J
Solicitors:
Bramwell Bate Ltd, Hastings for Applicants
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2022/1259.html