You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of New Zealand Decisions >>
2024 >>
[2024] NZHC 1306
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Estate of Hann [2024] NZHC 1306 (23 May 2024)
Last Updated: 23 July 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE
|
D2888/1939 [2024] NZHC 1306
|
UNDER
|
the Senior Courts (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017
|
IN THE MATTER
|
of Estate William John Hann
|
AND IN THE MATTER
|
of an application by Public Trust for access to the Court file in Dick v
Dick (D2888/1939)
|
Hearing:
|
On the papers
|
Judgment:
|
23 May 2024
|
JUDGMENT OF EATON J
This judgment was delivered by me on
........ at ......... pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules
Registrar/Deputy Registrar Date:
RE: ESTATE W J HANN [2024] NZHC 1306 [23 MAY 2024]
Introduction
- [1] William
John Hann died intestate on 24 May 2022. The Public Trust has been appointed as
the administrator in Mr Hann’s estate.
- [2] Mr Richard
Hocking, a trustee on behalf of the Public Trust initially corresponded with the
Registrar of this Court seeking a
copy of the marriage certificate in relation
to the marriage of Mr Hann’s mother, Doris Mabel Hann and David John
Graham Dick.
- [3] That request
was made as Mr Hocking sought to establish the closest next of kin who is to
benefit from Mr Hann’s estate
in accordance with the laws of intestacy.
The Public Trust have engaged a genealogist to assist in tracing Mr Hann’s
family
connections.
- [4] The
Registrar provided the marriage certificate. Mr Hocking now seeks access to a
1939 file dealing with the dissolution of Mr
Hann’s mothers’
marriage to Mr Dick. In particular Mr Hocking seeks access to any documentation
within the file that
confirms the names, dates of birth of any person related to
Mr Hann, and in particular children of the relationship between Doris
Hann and
David Dick.
- [5] Mr
Hocking’s request to access the file was made informally. I will treat it
as a formal application under the Senior Courts
(Access to Court Documents)
Rules 2017.
Legal principles
- [6] Any
application to access Court documents is governed by the Senior Courts (Access
to Court Documents) Rules 2017 (the Rules).
Under rr 8(1) and (2), every person
has a general right to access the “formal Court record” relating to
a civil proceeding.
As a non-party to the proceedings the subject of the file
and because documents beyond the “formal Court record” are
sought,
the application must be considered under r 11. Rule 7 also applies. That rule
relevantly provides:
7 Restriction on access in proceedings under
certain enactments
(1) A person may not access a document, a court file, or any judgment or
order that relates to a proceeding brought under the enactments
listed in
subclause (2) unless—
(a) the Judge is satisfied that there is good reason for permitting access;
or
(b) the person is a party to that proceeding.
(2) The enactments are—
...
(i) Family Protection Act 1955:
...
(u) any former provisions corresponding to current provisions of any of the Acts
mentioned in this subclause.
(3) This rule overrides rule 8.
- [7] The relevant
file is a petition for divorce filed on December 1939. I refer particularly to r
7(2)(u). I am satisfied that the
statutory basis upon which the 1939 petition
for divorce was filed corresponds to the provisions in the Family Proceedings
Act and
is therefore embraced by r 7.1
Analysis
- [8] I
am satisfied Mr Hocking on behalf of the Public Trust should be permitted access
to the divorce file. The file does contain
information identifying half-sisters
of Mr Hann and may therefore be of assistance to the Public Trust in identifying
his relations.
The inquiries on behalf of the Public Trust are appropriate given
Mr Hann died intestate.
- [9] I have
considered whether the file contains matters of a sensitive nature. I am
satisfied there is nothing within the file that
would offend the parties’
privacy interests.
1 Re Livingstone v Livingstone [2015] NZHC 2575; [2015]
NZAR 1827 at [8], and Rule v Rule
[2020] NZHC 2222 at [7].
- [10] I am
satisfied that permitting access to the file is in the interests of open justice
and I grant the application.
...................................................
Eaton J
Copy to:
Public Trust, Christchurch
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2024/1306.html