Northern Territory Numbered Regulations

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Regulation] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

WORK HEALTH AND SAFETY (NATIONAL UNIFORM LEGISLATION) REGULATIONS (NO 59 OF 2011) - REG 569

Review of risk management

    (1)     The operator of a licensed major hazard facility must review and as necessary revise the following, in accordance with this regulation:

(a)     the safety assessment for the facility in order to ensure the adequacy of the control measures to be implemented by the operator;

(b)     the major hazard facility's emergency plan;

(c)     the major hazard facility's safety management system.

Maximum penalty:

(a)     in the case of an individual – $6 000.

(b)     in the case of a body corporate – $30 000.

Note for subregulation (1)

Strict liability applies to each physical element of this offence. See section 12B of the Act.

    (2)     Without limiting subregulation (1), the operator must conduct a review and revision in the following circumstances:

(a)     a modification to the major hazard facility is proposed;

(b)     a control measure implemented under regulation 566 does not minimise the relevant risk so far as is reasonably practicable;

(c)     a new major hazard risk is identified;

(d)     the results of consultation by the operator under Part 9.5 indicate that a review is necessary;

(e)     a health and safety representative requests a review under subregulation (5);

(f)     the regulator requires the review;

(g)     at least once every 5 years.

Example for subregulation (2)(a)

An effectiveness test indicates a deficiency in the control measure.

    (3)     In reviewing and revising the safety assessment, the operator must comply with the requirements set out in regulation 555(2) , (3) and (4).

    (4)     In reviewing and revising the emergency plan, the operator must consult with the emergency service organisations referred to in regulation 557(2).

    (5)     A health and safety representative for workers at a major hazard facility may request a review if the representative reasonably believes that:

(a)     a circumstance referred to in subregulation (2)(a), (b), (c) or (d) affects or may affect the health and safety of a member of the work group represented by the health and safety representative; and

(b)     the operator has not adequately conducted a review in response to the circumstance.



AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback