[Index] [Search] [Download] [Help]
This is a Bill, not an Act. For current law, see the Acts databases.
South Australia
Statutes Amendment (Interstate Advance Directives)
Bill 2012
A BILL FOR
An Act to amend the Consent
to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 and the Guardianship
and Administration Act 1993.
Contents
Part 1—Preliminary
1Short
title
2Amendment provisions
Part 2—Amendment of Consent to Medical
Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995
3Insertion of Part
2A
Part 2A—Recognition of advance directives
from other jurisdictions
14ARecognition of advance directives from other
jurisdictions
Part 3—Amendment of Guardianship and
Administration Act 1993
4Insertion of section
27A
27ARecognition of
enduring guardians appointed in other jurisdictions
The Parliament of South Australia enacts as
follows:
This Act may be cited as the Statutes Amendment (Interstate Advance
Directives) Act 2012.
In this Act, a provision under a heading referring to the amendment of a
specified Act amends the Act so specified.
Part 2—Amendment
of Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative
Care Act 1995
After section 14 insert:
Part 2A—Recognition of advance directives from
other jurisdictions
14A—Recognition of advance directives from other
jurisdictions
(1) The Governor may, by regulation—
(a) declare a class of instruments made under a law of the Commonwealth,
or another State or Territory, to be an interstate advance
directive; and
(b) declare that a specified class of interstate advance directives will
be taken—
(i) to correspond to a specified instrument under a specified provision or
provisions of this Act; or
(ii) to have effect in this jurisdiction as if the law under which the
interstate advance directive was given applied in this State.
(2) Subject to this
section, for the purposes of the laws of this State, an interstate advance
directive that is in force has effect in this State—
(a) if the
interstate advance directive is declared to correspond to an anticipatory grant
or refusal of consent to medical treatment under section 7—as if it
were an anticipatory grant or refusal of consent to medical treatment given in
accordance with that section; or
(b) if the
interstate advance directive is declared to correspond to the appointment by
medical power of attorney of an agent with power to make decisions on a person's
behalf about medical treatment under section 8—as if it were such an
appointment made in accordance with that section; or
(c) if the interstate advance directive is declared to have effect in this
jurisdiction as if the law under which the interstate advance directive was
given applied in this State—in accordance with its terms and that
law.
(3) However, an interstate advance directive contemplated by
subsection (2)(a)
or
(b) does not have
effect in this State to the extent that it could not (having regard to any
limitations or exclusions relating to giving of anticipatory directions under
section 7 or the appointment of medical agents under section 8 (as the
case requires)) have been validly made under this Act.
(4) For the purposes of the laws of this State, an interstate advance
directive is subject to any limitations or exclusions (including a limitation or
exclusion in respect of the powers of a person appointed under the interstate
advance directive) that apply to it under the laws of the jurisdiction in which
it was given.
(5) For the purposes of the law of this State, the following provisions of
an interstate advance directive will be taken to be void and of no effect in
this State (whether or not the provision was able to be included in the
interstate advance directive in the jurisdiction in which it was
given):
(a) a provision that requires an unlawful act to be performed in this
State;
(b) a provision that would, if given effect, cause a medical practitioner
or other person to contravene a professional standard or code of conduct
(however described) that applies to the medical practitioner or
person;
(c) a provision that purports to compel, or authorises a person to compel,
a medical practitioner to provide, or to refuse to provide, a particular form of
medical treatment to a person;
(d) a provision
that purports to comprise a refusal of medical treatment ordered under a
community treatment order or a detention and treatment order under the Mental
Health Act 2009;
(e) any other provision of a kind declared by the regulations to be within
the ambit of this subsection.
(6) To avoid doubt, this section applies in relation to an interstate
advance directive whether it was given before or after the commencement of this
section.
Part 3—Amendment
of Guardianship and Administration
Act 1993
After section 27 insert:
27A—Recognition of enduring guardians appointed in
other jurisdictions
(1) Subject to this
section, an appointment of an enduring guardian (however described) under a law
of the Commonwealth, or another State or Territory, that is in force has effect
in this State as if it were an appointment of an enduring guardian under this
Act.
(2) However, an appointment of an enduring guardian contemplated by
subsection (1)
does not have effect in this State to the extent that the appointment could not
(having regard to any limitations or exclusions relating to the appointment of
enduring guardians under section 25) have been validly made under this
Act.
(3) For the purposes of the laws of this State, an appointment of an
enduring guardian contemplated by
subsection (1)
is subject to any limitations or exclusions (including a limitation or exclusion
in respect of the powers of the enduring guardian) that apply to it under the
laws of the jurisdiction in which it was made.
(4) Section 26 does not apply in relation to an appointment of an
enduring guardian contemplated by
subsection (1).
(5) To avoid doubt, this section applies in relation to an appointment of
an enduring guardian whether it was made before or after the commencement of
this section.