(1) In proceedings for
an offence against this Act, an apparently genuine document purporting to be a
certificate signed by the Minister certifying—
(a) that
a person named in the certificate was at a specified time a delegate of the
Minister unconditionally or subject to specified conditions; or
(b) that
a person named in the certificate was or was not at a specified time the
holder of a specified aquaculture lease or licence; or
(c) that
a provision set out in the certificate was at a specified time a condition of
a specified aquaculture lease or licence; or
(d) that
a person named in the certificate was or was not at a specified time a
responsible person for a specified aquaculture tourism development
authorisation under Part 7A; or
(e) that
a person named in the certificate was or was not at a specified time the
holder of a specified tourism lease or tourism licence under Part 7A,
is, in the absence of proof to the contrary, proof of the matters certified.
(2) In proceedings for
an offence against this Act, an allegation in the complaint—
(a) that
a person named in the complaint was an authorised person on a specified day in
relation to a specified marked-off area; or
(b) that
a person named in the complaint was at a specified time a fisheries officer;
or
(c) that
an organism in relation to which an act or omission is alleged to have been
done or made was an aquatic organism of a specified species or was an aquatic
organism having a specified characteristic,
is, in the absence of proof to the contrary, proof of the matter alleged.
(3) In proceedings for
an offence against this Act, evidence of a distance, height, depth or position
as determined by the use of an electronic, sonic, optical, mechanical or other
device by a fisheries officer or any other competent person will, in the
absence of proof to the contrary, be accepted as proof of the distance,
height, depth or position.
(4) In proceedings for
an offence against this Act, a statement made in evidence by a fisheries
officer that a place or area described or indicated by him or her was or was
not within a specified aquaculture lease or licence area or a specified
marked-off area will, in the absence of proof to the contrary, be accepted as
proof of the matter so stated.
(5) In proceedings for
an offence against this Act, if it is proved that aquatic organisms were
present in the area of a licence at a specified time or date it will be
presumed, in the absence of proof to the contrary, that the aquatic organisms
were being farmed for the purposes of trade or business or research at that
time or date.