(1) A person commits an offence if the person:
(a) is summoned to appear before a Panel of the Disciplinary Tribunal; and
(b) does not comply with the summons by:
(i) appearing as required by the summons; and
(ii) producing documents or articles as required by the summons; and
(iii) appearing and reporting to the Panel, as required.
(2) It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against subregulation (1) if:
(a) the defendant is prevented or hindered from complying with the summons by:
(i) a circumstance mentioned in Part 2.3 of the Criminal Code ; or
(ii) any other circumstance that the Panel Chair reasonably considers is an impediment to the defendant complying with the summons; or
(b) in relation to subparagraph (1)(b)(iii)--the defendant is excused by the Panel Chair.
Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters mentioned in subparagraph (2)(a)(i) (see section 13.3 of the Criminal Code ).
(3) A person commits an offence if:
(a) the person:
(i) is not a trade marks attorney director to whom subregulation (5) applies; and
(ii) appears as a witness before a Panel of the Disciplinary Tribunal; and
(iii) has been paid expenses and allowances in accordance with Part 2 of Schedule 8 to the Patents Regulations 1991 ; and
(c) the person refuses:
(i) to be sworn or make an affirmation; or
(ii) to answer a question relevant to the evidence that the person was summoned to give.
(4) Strict liability applies to the physical element of an offence against subregulation (3) that is constituted by:
(a) the circumstance mentioned in subparagraph (3)(a)(i); and
(b) the circumstance mentioned in subparagraph (3)(a)(iii).
Note: For strict liability , see section 6.1 of the Criminal Code .
(5) A person commits an offence if the person:
(a) is a trade marks attorney director who has been summoned to appear at a hearing before a Panel of the Disciplinary Tribunal; and
(b) refuses:
(i) to be sworn or to make an affirmation; or
(ii) to answer a question relevant to the evidence that the person was summoned to give.
(6) It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against subregulation (3) or (5) if a person mentioned in the subregulation refused to answer a question or to produce a document or article because the answer to the question, or the document or article, may tend to prove that the person has committed an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory.