(1) The CEO may, under
section 140(2)(b) of the Act, refuse to transfer an authorisation or part
of an entitlement under an authorisation on the grounds that —
(a) the
proposed transferor or transferee has not provided information, or further
information, required by the CEO for a proper consideration of the
application, or has refused to verify such information by statutory
declaration; or
(b)
where the authorisation is held in respect of a boat, the boat is unseaworthy,
lost or destroyed; or
(ba)
where the holder has 2 or more authorisations and all of those
authorisations are not simultaneously being transferred to the same
transferee, in the opinion of the CEO, it is not in the best interests of the
fishery to transfer the authorisation; or
(c) the
holder has not used the authorisation in the previous 2 years; or
(d) the
holder has been convicted of an offence against —
(i)
the Act or these regulations; or
(ii)
a written law other than this Act if the offence relates
to the fishing industry; or
(iii)
a law of the Commonwealth, or of another State or
Territory, relating to the management or regulation of fish resources;
or
(e) in
the opinion of the CEO, a condition of the authorisation has been contravened;
or
(f) the
authorisation was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation; or
(g) the
holder has —
(i)
failed to keep any record, or submit any return, that is
required to be kept or submitted under this Act; or
(ii)
made an entry or statement in such a record or return
that is false or misleading in a material particular;
or
(h) a
fee, charge or levy payable in respect of the authorisation has not been paid
when it became due; or
(i)
the transfer would contravene a condition of the
authorisation or be contrary to a provision of a management plan; or
(j) a
conviction has been recorded in respect of the authorisation under
section 224(1) of the Act.
(2) For the purposes
of subregulation (1)(j), a conviction is taken to have been recorded in
respect of an authorisation if —
(a) a
conviction has been recorded in respect of another authorisation under
section 224(1) of the Act; and
(b) the
other authorisation ceases to have effect because the management plan in
respect of which it was granted is revoked or expired; and
(c) the
holding of the other authorisation was a fact that the CEO took into account
when granting the authorisation.
[Regulation 131 amended: Gazette
29 Jun 2001 p. 3175; 6 Jul 2007 p. 3389;
9 Sep 2014 p. 3239-40.]