LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) † | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Day & Dent Constructions Pty Ltd v North Australian Properties Pty Ltd |
[1982] HCA 20; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 30 Apr 1982 | AustLII |
|
|
Skelton v Collins |
[1966] HCA 14; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 7 Mar 1966 | AustLII |
|
|
"Uniformity of Empire Law" | [1951] Res Jud 3 | Joske, P E | Australia | circa 1951 | AustLII |
|
|
vining v vining |
[1950] VicLawRp 9; |
Australia - Victoria | 6 Mar 1950 | AustLII |
|
||
Handcock v Handcock NZCA |
[1949] NZGazLawRp 25; |
New Zealand Gazette Law Reports | New Zealand | 1 Apr 1949 | NZLII |
|
|
Wright v Wright |
[1948] HCA 33; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 29 Nov 1948 | AustLII |
|
|
McIlroy v McIlroy |
[1946] HCA 4; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 8 Apr 1946 | AustLII |
|
|
Waghorn v Waghorn |
[1942] HCA 1; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 4 Feb 1942 | AustLII |
|
|
In re Austral Development Co Pty Ltd |
[1942] ArgusLawRp 3; |
Argus Law Reports | Australia | 5 Feb 1942 | AustLII |
|
|
Waghorn v Waghorn |
[1942] ArgusLawRp 1; |
Argus Law Reports | Australia | 4 Feb 1942 | AustLII |
|
|
Sheehan v Sheehan |
[1940] SAStRp 39; |
Supreme Court of South Australia | Australia - South Australia | 22 Aug 1940 | AustLII |
|
|
Mcgovern v Mcgovern |
[1939] VicLawRp 60; |
Australia - Victoria | 13 Nov 1939 | AustLII |
|
||
Tracy v Tracy |
[1939] NSWStRp 40; |
Supreme Court of New South Wales | Australia - New South Wales | 22 Nov 1939 | AustLII |
|
Journal Article Title | Citation(s) † | Author | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
"Precedent in South Australia: The Hierarchic and the Heuristic" | (1980-1981) 7 Adelaide Law Review 79 | Blackshield, A R | Australia | circa 1981 | AustLII |
|
|
"Uniformity of Empire Law" | [1951] Res Jud 3 | Joske, P E | Australia | circa 1951 | AustLII |
|
|
"A Government of Laws and Yet of Men: Being a Survey of Half a Century of the Australian Commerce Power" | (1950) 1 (3) University of Western Australia Law Review 461 | Stone, Julius | Australia - Western Australia | circa 1950 | AustLII |
|
Case Name | Citation(s) † | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Hopkins v Hopkins |
[1936] VicLawRp 23; |
Australia - Victoria | 28 Apr 1936 | AustLII |
|
||
Cook v Cook |
[1934] SAStRp 39; |
Australia - South Australia | 30 Aug 1934 | AustLII |
|
||
Wright v Annandale |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1930 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Gray v Gray |
|
Australia - Queensland | circa 1925 |
|
|||
Durnford v Baker |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1924 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Palrner v Palrner |
|
circa 1923 |
|
||||
Everett v Everett |
|
circa 1919 |
|
||||
Brooking-Phillips v Brooking-Phillips |
[1913] UKLawRpPro 7; |
United Kingdom | 13 Feb 1913 | CommonLII |
|
||
Stevenson v Stevenson |
[1911] UKLawRpPro 20; |
United Kingdom | 14 Jul 1911 | CommonLII |
|
||
Harriman v Harriman |
[1909] UKLawRpPro 6; |
United Kingdom | 9 Feb 1909 | CommonLII |
|
||
White v White |
[1908] HCA 80; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 2 Dec 1908 | AustLII |
|
|
Kay v Kay |
[1904] UKLawRpPro 19; |
United Kingdom | 12 May 1904 | CommonLII |
|
||
Frowd v Frowd |
[1904] UKLawRpPro 12; |
United Kingdom | 1 Mar 1904 | CommonLII |
|
||
Douglas v Douglas |
|
New Zealand | circa 1903 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Synge v Synge |
[1900] UKLawRpPro 27; |
United Kingdom | 21 May 1900 | CommonLII |
|
||
Sickert v Sickert |
[1899] UKLawRpPro 34; |
United Kingdom | 26 Jul 1899 | CommonLII |
|
||
Oldroyd v Oldroyd |
[1896] UKLawRpPro 26; |
United Kingdom | 22 May 1896 | CommonLII |
|
||
Russell v Russell |
[1895] UKLawRpPro 31; |
United Kingdom | 7 Aug 1895 | CommonLII |
|
||
Otway v Otway |
[1888] UKLawRpPro 28; |
United Kingdom | 11 May 1888 | CommonLII |
|
||
Knapp v Knapp (No 2) |
[1880] UKLawRpPro 23; |
United Kingdom | 5 May 1880 | CommonLII |
|
||
R v Flintan |
[1830] EngR 214; |
Kings Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1830 | CommonLII |
|
|
Beeby v Beeby |
[1828] EngR 15; |
United Kingdom | circa 1828 | CommonLII |
|
||
Govier v Hancock |
[1796] EngR 2357; |
King's Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1796 | CommonLII |
|
|
Forster v Forster |
[1790] EngR 2536; |
United Kingdom | circa 1790 | CommonLII |
|
||
Cargill v Cargill |
|
United Kingdom | CommonLII |
|
|||
Hope v Hope |
|
United Kingdom | CommonLII |
|
|||
5 Sec 9 |
|
United States |
|