National Starch & Chemical Co v Commissioner of Patents
|
[2001] FCA 33; 50 IPR 398; [2001] AIPC 91-697
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
2 Feb 2001
|
AustLII
|
|
151 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Nippon Steel Corporation v BHP Steel (Jla) Pty Ltd
|
[1998] APO 5
|
IP Australia - Australian Patent Office
|
Australia
|
26 Feb 1998
|
AustLII
|
|
2
|
Exxon Chemical Patents Inc v Lubrizol Corporation
|
(1998) 41 IPR 126
|
|
|
circa 1998
|
LexisNexis AU
|
|
12
|
Dominion Mining Ltd v MIM Holdings Ltd
|
[1997] APO 27
|
IP Australia - Australian Patent Office
|
Australia
|
11 Jun 1997
|
AustLII
|
|
12
|
A Goninan & Co Ltd v Commissioner of Patents
|
[1997] FCA 424; 75 FCR 200; (1997) 38 IPR 213; [1997] AIPC 91-330; 48 ALD 209
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
23 May 1997
|
AustLII
|
|
239 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Orion-Yhtyma Oy v William John Pickering
|
[1997] APO 15
|
IP Australia - Australian Patent Office
|
Australia
|
24 Apr 1997
|
AustLII
|
|
2
|
Raffaele v Tetley GB Ltd
|
[1997] APO 2; [1997] AIPC 39,296; 36 IPR 481
|
IP Australia - Australian Patent Office
|
Australia
|
13 Jan 1997
|
AustLII
|
|
2
|
Stena Rederi Aktiebolag v Danyard A/S
|
[1996] APO 12; 34 IPR 111
|
IP Australia - Australian Patent Office
|
Australia
|
27 Feb 1996
|
AustLII
|
|
10
|
Ferocem Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents
|
[1994] FCA 981; (1994) 49 FCR 205; 28 IPR 243; [1994] AIPC 91-057
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
24 Mar 1994
|
AustLII
|
|
299 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Kirin-Amgen Inc v Board of Regents of the University of Washington
|
[1994] APO 9
|
IP Australia - Australian Patent Office
|
Australia
|
25 Jan 1994
|
AustLII
|
|
1
|
Kimberly-Clark Corporation v the Procter & Gamble Co
|
[1993] APO 34; 26 IPR 581
|
IP Australia - Australian Patent Office
|
Australia
|
13 May 1993
|
AustLII
|
|
8
|
Vangedal-Nielsen v Smith (Commissioner of Patents)
|
[1980] FCA 163; 49 FLR 44; (1980) 33 ALR 144; 48 ALT 164; 1A IPR 731; (1980) 3 ALN N21
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
19 Dec 1980
|
AustLII
|
|
243 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Kaiser Aluminium & Chemical Corporation v Reynolds Metal Co
|
[1969] HCA 7; (1969) 120 CLR 136; [1969] ALR 621; 43 ALJR 156
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
14 Mar 1969
|
AustLII
|
|
230 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Gentia Software plc v Arbor Software Corporation
|
42 IPR 169
|
|
|
circa 1969
|
LexisNexis AU
|
|
9
|