West Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette
|
319 US 624; 87 L Ed 2d 1628; 87 L Ed 1628; 63 SCt 1178; 633 SCt 1178; 87 L Ed 1173
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
14 Jun 1943
|
WorldLII
|
|
502 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Hosking v Runting
|
[2004] NZCA 34; [2005] 1 NZLR 1; (2004) 7 HRNZ 3001
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
25 Mar 2004
|
NZLII
|
|
203 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Ministry of Transport v Noort
|
[1992] NZCA 51; [1992] 3 NZLR 260; [1990-92] 1 NZBORR 97; (1992) 8 CRNZ 114
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
30 Apr 1992
|
NZLII
|
|
203 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Thomas v Review Bd of Indiana Employment Security Div
|
450 US 707; 67 L Ed 2d 624; 101 SCt 1425
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
6 Apr 1981
|
WorldLII
|
|
180 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education and Employment
|
[2005] UKHL 15; [2005] 2 AC 246; [2005] 2 All ER 1; [2005] 2 WLR 590; [2005] ELR 291
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
24 Feb 2005
|
BAILII
|
|
113 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Coy v Iowa
|
487 US 1012; 101 L Ed 2d 857; 108 SCt 2798
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
29 Jun 1988
|
WorldLII
|
|
113 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Corporation of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints v Amos
|
483 US 327; 97 L Ed 2d 273; 107 SCt 2862
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
24 Jun 1987
|
WorldLII
|
|
86 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Gisborne Herald Co Ltd v Solicitor-General
|
[1995] NZCA 318; [1995] 3 NZLR 563; (1995) 2 HRNZ 142; (1995) 13 CRNZ 244
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
22 Sep 1995
|
NZLII
|
|
62 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
R v Lyons
|
[1987] INSC 47; [1987] 2 SCR 309; 1987 1 SCALE 361; 1987 1 JT 469; 1987 2 SCC 93; AIR 1987 SC 1161
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
17 Feb 1987
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
57 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
R v Hines
|
[1997] NZCA 123; [1997] 3 NZLR 529; (1997) 4 HRNZ 352; (1997) 15 CRNZ 158
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
15 Aug 1997
|
NZLII
|
|
48 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
R v b
|
[1994] NZCA 547; [1995] 2 NZLR 172; (1994) 1 HRNZ 1; (1994) 12 CRNZ 417
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
12 Dec 1994
|
NZLII
|
|
44 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Cutter v Wilkinson
|
544 US 709; 125 SCt 2113; 161 L Ed 2d 1020
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
31 May 2005
|
WorldLII
|
|
35 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
R v l Ca421/93
|
[1993] NZCA 553; [1994] 2 NZLR 54; (1993) 1 HRNZ 310; (1993) 11 CRNZ 8
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
18 Nov 1993
|
NZLII
|
|
34 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Upton v Green (No 2)
|
[1996] NZHC 2105; (1996) 3 HRNZ 179
|
High Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
10 Oct 1996
|
NZLII
|
|
21 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
"Demeanor"
|
(1991) 76 Cornell Law Review 1075
|
Cornell Law Review
|
United States
|
circa 1991
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
19 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Syndicat Northcrest v Amselem
|
[2004] 2 SCR 551; [2004] SCC 47
|
|
|
circa 2004
|
|
|
16
|
R v Crime Appeal 163/88
|
[1988] NZCA 250; [1989] 1 NZLR 660; (1988) 3 CRNZ 315
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
20 Dec 1988
|
NZLII
|
|
16
|
Brown v Attorney-General
|
[2003] NZHC 1168; [2003] 3 NZLR 335; (2003) 7 HRNZ 100
|
High Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
14 Feb 2003
|
NZLII
|
|
15
|
Mair v Wanganui District Court
|
[1996] 1 NZLR 556
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1996
|
LexisNexis
|
|
12
|
Police v Razamjoo
|
[2005] DCR (NSW) 408
|
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
11
|
Mendelssohn v Attorney-General
|
[1999] NZCA 67; [1999] 2 NZLR 268; (1999) 5 HRNZ 1
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
4 May 1999
|
NZLII
|
|
9
|
"A Wipe of the Hands, A Lick of the Lips: The Validity of Demeanor Evidence in Assessing Witness Credibility"
|
(1993) 72 Nebraska Law Review 1157
|
Nebraska Law Review
|
United States
|
circa 1993
|
HeinOnline / LexisNexis
|
|
6 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Edmunds v Deppisch
|
313 F3d 997
|
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
|
United States
|
18 Dec 2002
|
WorldLII
|
|
5
|
R v Atkins
|
[2000] NZCA 9; [2000] 2 NZLR 46
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
9 Feb 2000
|
NZLII
|
|
5
|
2 NZLR 134
|
2 NZLR 134
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1993
|
LexisNexis
|
|
5
|
"Human Rights"
|
[2005] New Zealand Law Review 87
|
New Zealand Law Review
|
New Zealand
|
circa 2005
|
HeinOnline / Informit / LexisNexis
|
|
4
|
Morales v Artuz
|
281 F3d 55
|
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
|
United States
|
8 Feb 2002
|
WorldLII
|
|
4
|
Aeromotive Ltd v Page
|
(2002) 16 PRNZ 329
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 2002
|
|
|
4
|
Feau v Department of Social Welfare
|
(1995) 2 HRNZ 528
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1995
|
|
|
2
|
"Defining the secular in the New Zealand Bill of Rights era: Some cases and controversies"
|
(2011) 12 Otago Law Review 497
|
Griffiths, David H
|
New Zealand
|
circa 2011
|
NZLII
|
|
1
|
Romero v Texas
|
(2004) 136 SW 3d 680
|
US
|
|
circa 2004
|
|
|
1
|
Valsamis v Greece
|
[1996] 2 ECHR 2312
|
European Court of Human Rights
|
Europe
|
circa 1996
|
BAILII
|
|
1
|
[1986] 1 SCR 183
|
[1986] 1 SCR 183
|
|
|
circa 1986
|
|
|
1
|
McMillan aka Olugbala v Maryland
|
(1970) 258 Md 147
|
|
United States - Maryland
|
circa 1970
|
|
|
1
|
R v Sussex Justices exp McCarthy
|
[1924] 2 All ER 635
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1924
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|