Shri Chander Sekhar: "18 We however do not deem it necessary to adjudicate on the proviso after Section 8(1) (j) of the Act and leave the same to be adjudicated in an appropriate proceedings We may however notice that a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Surupsingh Hrya Naik Vs Maharashtra
|
AIR 2007 Bom 121
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 2007
|
|
|
|
People's Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India
|
(2004) 2 SCC 476
|
|
|
circa 2004
|
|
|
|
Dinesh Trivedi, MP v Union of India
|
(1997) 4 SCC 306
|
|
|
circa 1997
|
|
|
|
(1993) 4 SCC 120
|
(1993) 4 SCC 120
|
|
|
circa 1993
|
|
|
|
S Sundaram Pillai v vR Pattabiraman
|
[1985] INSC 13; 1985 1 SCALE 74; 1985 1 SCC 591; 1985 2 SCR 643; AIR 1985 SC 582
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
24 Jan 1985
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
|
[1979-3] All Er 700
|
[1979-3] All ER 700
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1979
|
LexisNexis
|
|
|
Rogers v Home Secretary
|
[1973] AC 388; [1972] 2 All ER 1057; [1972] 3 WLR 279
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1973
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
|
Conway v Rimmer
|
[1968] UKHL 2; [1968] AC 910; [1968] 1 All ER 874; [1968] 2 WLR 998
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
28 Feb 1968
|
BAILII
|
|
|
O K Ghosh & Anr v E X Joseph
|
[1962] INSC 298; 1963 1 SCR Supl 789; AIR 1963 SC 812
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
30 Oct 1962
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
|
Punjab v Sodhi Sukhdev Singh
|
[1960] INSC 196; [1961] 2 SCR 371; AIR 1961 SC 493
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
15 Nov 1960
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
|