LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

"Can DNA Evidence Alone Convict An Accused?"    

Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article

Journal Article Title	Citation(s)	Author	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
- Jury Directions	[2012] NSWLRC 136	New South Wales Law Reform Commission	Australia - New South Wales	circa 2012	AustLII

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article

Journal Article Title	Citation(s)	Author	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
"Murders With Missing Bodies: Evidential Construction of Prosecutorial No-Body Murder Cases" [2022] CanLawRw 9	(2022) 19 Canberra Law Review 149	Kashif, Rumesha	Australia	circa 2022	AustLII
"Law vs Science: Genomic Evidence, Wrongful Convictions and the Requirement for a Statutory Framework" [2022] CanLawRw 2	(2022) 19 Canberra Law Review 1	Young, Molly	Australia	circa 2022	AustLII
"Latent Science: A History of Challenges to Fingerprint Evidence in Australia"	(2019) 38 University of Queensland Law Journal 301	Edmond, Gary	Australia	circa 2019	AustLII
"What Lawyers Should and Can Do Now That They Know About the Forensic Sciences"	(2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 153	Ligertwood, Andrew	Australia	circa 2015	AustLII

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
Aytugrul v R	[2011] HCATrans 238	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	2 Sep 2011	AustLII
R v Meyboom	[2011] ACTSC 13; (2011) 208 A Crim R 551	Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory	Australia - Australian Capital Territory	4 Feb 2011	AustLII
"Procedural Fairness, the Criminal Trial and Forensic Science and Medicine"	(2011) 33 Sydney Law Review 359	Sydney Law Review	Australia	circa 2011	AustLII
"A Tale of Two High Court Forensic Cases"	(2011) 33 Sydney Law Review 515	Sydney Law Review	Australia	circa 2011	AustLII
R v Marticanaj	[2010] SASCFC 82	Supreme Court of South Australia - Full Court	Australia - South Australia	23 Dec 2010	AustLII
Aytugrul v R	[2010] NSWCCA 272; (2010) 205 A Crim R 157	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	3 Dec 2010	AustLII
R v Carroll	[2010] SASC 156	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	28 May 2010	AustLII
Forbes v R	[2010] HCATrans 120	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	18 May 2010	AustLII
Forbes v R	[2010] HCATrans 45	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	12 Mar 2010	AustLII
"Safety in Numbers? Deciding When DNA Alone is Enough to Convict"	(2010) 85 New York University Law Review 1130	New York University Law Review	United States	circa 2010	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
"Probability, Individualization, and Uniqueness in Forensic Science Evidence"	(2010) 75 Brooklyn Law Review 1163	Brooklyn Law Review	United States	circa 2010	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
"Individualization Claims in Forensic Science: Still Unwarranted"	(2010) 75 Brooklyn Law Review 1187	Brooklyn Law Review	United States	circa 2010	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
Forbes v R	[2009] ACTCA 10; (2009) 167 ACTR 1; (2009) 232 FLR 229	Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory - Court of Appeal	Australia - Australian Capital Territory	19 Jun 2009	AustLII
"Rounding Dp The Usual Suspects: A Legal And Logical Analysis Of Dna Trawling Cases"	(2009) 87 North Carolina Law Review 425	North Carolina Law Review	United States	circa 2009	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
"Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic Dna interpretation"	(2009) 8 Law Probability and Risk 257	Law, Probability and Risk		circa 2009	Westlaw
"Forensics without uniqueness, conclusions without individualization: the new epistemology of forensic identification"	(2009) 8 Law Probability and Risk 233	Law, Probability and Risk		circa 2009	Westlaw
"The Art in the Science of Dna: A Layperson's Guide to the Subjectivity Inherent in Forensic Dna Typing"	(2008) 58 Emory Law Journal 489	Emory Law Journal	United States	circa 2008	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
"The Individualization Fallacy in Forensic Science Evidence"	(2008) 61 Vanderbilt Law Review 199	Vanderbilt Law Review	United States	circa 2008	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
"Juridical Proof and the Best Explanation"	(2008) 27 Law and Philosophy 223	Law and Philosophy		circa 2008
Western Australia v Montani	[2007] WASCA 259; (2007) 182 A Crim R 155	Supreme Court of Western Australia - Court of Appeal	Australia - Western Australia	23 Nov 2007	AustLII
R v Gum	[2007] SASC 311; (2007) 108 SASR 77	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	22 Aug 2007	AustLII
R v Parenzee	[2007] SASC 143; 143 ALR 761	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	27 Apr 2007	AustLII
R v Hillier	[2007] HCA 13; (2007) 228 CLR 618; (2007) 233 ALR 634; (2007) 81 ALJR 886	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	22 Mar 2007	AustLII
"Csi And Its Effects: Media, Juries, And The Burden Of Proof"	(2007) 41 New England Law Review 435	New England Law Review	United States	circa 2007	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
"The New Forensics: Criminal Justice, False Certainty, And The Second Generation Of Scientific Evidence"	(2007) 95 California Law Review 721	California Law Review	United States	circa 2007	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
Darkan v R	[2006] HCA 34; (2006) 227 CLR 373; 228 ALR 334; (2006) 80 ALJR 1250; 163 A Crim R 80	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	22 Jun 2006	AustLII
Police v Leo	[2006] SASC 144; (2006) 94 SASR 496; (2006) 161 A Crim R 320	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	17 May 2006	AustLII
United States v Copeland	369 FSupp 2d 275		United States	circa 2006	Westlaw
W v R	(2006) 16 Tas SR 1		Australia - Tasmania	circa 2006
United States v Copeland	369 FSupp 2d 275		United States	circa 2006	Westlaw
"Quantifying the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt: a comment on three comments"	(2006) 5 Law Probability and Risk 267	Law, Probability and Risk		circa 2006	Westlaw
"Comment on the meaning of ‘proof beyond a reasonable doubt’"	(2006) 5 Law Probability and Risk 167	Law, Probability and Risk		circa 2006	Westlaw
R v Cavkic; R v Athanasi; R v Clarke	[2005] VSCA 182; (2005) 12 VR 136; (2005) 155 A Crim R 275	Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal	Australia - Victoria	2 Aug 2005	AustLII
R v Brady	[2005] SASC 277; (2005) 92 SASR 135; 155 A Crim R 230	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	22 Jul 2005	AustLII
R v Momodou	[2005] EWCA Crim 177; [2005] 2 All ER 571; (2005) 169 JP 186; [2005] 1 WLR 3442; [2005] All ER (D) 35; [2005] Crim LR 588; [2005] 2 Cr App R 6	England and Wales Court of Appeal - Criminal Division	United Kingdom - England and Wales	2 Feb 2005	BAILII
R v Rowe	[2004] SASC 424	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	17 Dec 2004	AustLII
R v Knight	[2003] EWCA Crim 1977; [2004] 1 WLR 340; [2003] Crim LR 799; [2003] All ER (D) 490; [2004] 1 Cr App R 9	England and Wales Court of Appeal - Criminal Division	United Kingdom - England and Wales	29 Jul 2003	BAILII
"Communicating Statistical Dna Evidence"	(2003) 43 Jurimetrics 147	Jurimetrics	United States	circa 2003	HeinOnline
R v Karger	[2002] SASC 294; (2002) 83 SASR 135	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	30 Aug 2002	AustLII
R v Galli	[2001] NSWCCA 504; (2001) 127 A Crim R 493	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	12 Dec 2001	AustLII
R v GK	[2001] NSWCCA 413; (2001) 53 NSWLR 317; (2001) 125 A Crim R 315	Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal	Australia - New South Wales	16 Oct 2001	AustLII
R v Karger	[2001] SASC 64; (2001) 83 SASR 1	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	29 Mar 2001	AustLII
R v Macaskill	[2001] SASC 318; (2001) 81 SASR 152	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	circa 2001	AustLII
"The Psychology of Numbers in the Courtroom: How to Make DNA-Match Statistics Seem Impressive or Insufficient"	(2001) 74 Southern California Law Review 1275	Southern California Law Review	United States	circa 2001	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
"When Are People Persuaded By Dna Match Statistics?"	(2001) 25 Law and Human Behavior 493	Law and Human Behavior		circa 2001	Westlaw
"DNA Profiling: A discussion of issues relating to the reporting of a very small match probabilities"	[2000] Criminal Law Review 341	Criminal Law Review	United Kingdom	circa 2000	Westlaw
R v Hookway	[1999] EWCA Crim 212; [1999] Crim LR 750	England and Wales Court of Appeal - Criminal Division	United Kingdom - England and Wales	1 Feb 1999	BAILII
"Laboratory Error Seen Through the Lens of Science and Policy"	(1996) 30 UC Davis Law Review 1081	U.C. Davis Law Review	United States	circa 1996	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
"On Conveying the Probative Value of DNA Evidence: Frequencies, Likelihood Ratios, and Error Rates"	(1996) 67 University of Colorado Law Review 859	University of Colorado Law Review	United States	circa 1996	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
R v Adams	[1996] 2 Cr App R 467; [1996] Crim LR 898		United Kingdom	circa 1996	LexisNexis
Weissensteiner v R	[1993] HCA 65; (1993) 178 CLR 217; (1993) 117 ALR 545; (1993) 68 ALJR 23; (1993) 68 A Crim R 251	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	17 Nov 1993	AustLII
Edwards v R	[1993] HCA 63; (1993) 178 CLR 193; 117 ALR 600; (1993) 68 ALJR 40; (1993) 68 A Crim R 349	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	17 Nov 1993	AustLII
Questions of Law Reserved on Acquittal (No 2 of 1993)	[1993] SASC 4152; (1993) 61 SASR 1; (1993) 70 A Crim R 323	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	8 Sep 1993	AustLII
Thorp v Abbotto	[1992] FCA 112; (1992) 34 FCR 366; (1992) 106 ALR 239; (1992) 59 A Crim R 208; (1992) 26 ALD 668	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	18 Mar 1992	AustLII
"The Nature of Juridical Proof"	(1991) 13 Cardozo Law Review 373	Cardozo Law Review	United States	circa 1991	HeinOnline / LexisNexis
Doney v R	[1990] HCA 51; (1990) 171 CLR 207; 96 ALR 539; (1990) 65 ALJR 45; 50 A Crim R 157; [1990] LRC (Crim) 416	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	27 Nov 1990	AustLII
Chedzey v R	(1987) 30 A Crim R 451		Australia	circa 1987	Legal Online / Westlaw
R v Flesch	(1987) 7 NSWLR 554; (1986) 24 A Crim R 290		Australia - New South Wales	circa 1987	LexisNexis AU
R v Bilick & Starke	(1984) 36 SASR 321; (1984) 11 A Crim R 452	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	circa 1984	Legal Online / Westlaw
Whitehorn v R	[1983] HCA 42; (1983) 152 CLR 657; 49 ALR 448; (1983) 57 ALJR 809; 9 A Crim R 107	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	8 Nov 1983	AustLII
R v Prasad	(1979) 23 SASR 161; (1979) 2 A Crim R 45	Supreme Court of South Australia	Australia - South Australia	circa 1979	Legal Online / Westlaw
Green v R	[1971] HCA 55; (1971) 126 CLR 28; [1972] ALR 524; 46 ALJR 545	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	16 Nov 1971	AustLII
Dawson v R	[1961] HCA 74; (1961) 106 CLR 1; [1962] ALR 365; 35 ALJR 360	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	23 Nov 1961	AustLII
Thomas v R	[1960] HCA 2; (1960) 102 CLR 584; [1960] ALR 233; 33 ALJR 413	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	29 Jan 1960	AustLII
Brown v R	[1913] HCA 70; (1913) 17 CLR 570; 20 ALR 197	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	19 Dec 1914	AustLII
R v Parker	[1912] ArgusLawRp 24; [1912] VicLawRp 14; [1912] VLR 152; (1912) 18 ALR 150; 33 ALT 215	Argus Law Reports	Australia	12 Apr 1912	AustLII
La Fontaine v R	[1976] HCA 52; 136 CLR 62; 11 ALR 507; 51 ALJR 145; 27 ALT 138	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	6 Nov 1905	AustLII
United States v Copeland	369 FSupp 2d 275		United States		Westlaw