Wan v R
|
[2019] VSCA 81
|
Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Victoria
|
11 Apr 2019
|
AustLII
|
|
15
|
DPP v Lian
|
[2019] VSCA 75
|
Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Victoria
|
8 Apr 2019
|
AustLII
|
|
18
|
Zhao v R
|
[2018] VSCA 267
|
Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Victoria
|
24 Oct 2018
|
AustLII
|
|
47 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
DPP (Cth) v Lam
|
[2018] VCC 1655
|
County Court of Victoria
|
Australia - Victoria
|
10 Oct 2018
|
AustLII
|
|
3
|
Maybus v R
|
[2017] VSCA 125
|
Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Victoria
|
30 May 2017
|
AustLII
|
|
15
|
Konamala v R
|
[2016] VSCA 48
|
Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Victoria
|
21 Mar 2016
|
AustLII
|
|
68 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Phillips v R
|
[2012] VSCA 140; (2012) 37 VR 594; (2012) 222 A Crim R 149
|
Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Victoria
|
29 Jun 2012
|
AustLII
|
|
231 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Nguyen v R
|
[2011] VSCA 32; (2011) 31 VR 673; (2011) 207 A Crim R 380
|
Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Victoria
|
16 Feb 2011
|
AustLII
|
|
205 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Guden v R
|
[2010] VSCA 196; (2010) 28 VR 288
|
Supreme Court of Victoria - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Victoria
|
6 Aug 2010
|
AustLII
|
|
253 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
R v Nguyen; R v Pham
|
[2010] NSWCCA 238; (2010) 205 A Crim R 106
|
Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
22 Oct 2010
|
AustLII
|
|
294 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
DPP (DPP) (Cth) v De La Rosa
|
(2010) 79 NSWLR 1
|
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
circa 2010
|
LexisNexis AU
|
|
648 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Cameron v R
|
[2002] HCA 6; (2002) 209 CLR 339; (2002) 187 ALR 65; (2002) 23 Leg Rep C1
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
14 Feb 2002
|
AustLII
|
|
842 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|
Atholwood v R
|
[1999] WASCA 256; (1999) 109 A Crim R 465
|
Supreme Court of Western Australia - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Western Australia
|
circa 1999
|
AustLII
|
|
125 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c595c/c595c43f71fc035168d955a946d9b565ba93b56d" alt=""
|