LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Chen (Deborah) v University of the West Indies (The)   flag 

[2022] JMCA 62
Court of Appeal of Jamaica
Jamaica
13th May, 2022

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
R (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 982; [2005] Imm AR 535; [2005] INLR 633 England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division United Kingdom - England and Wales 27 Jul 2005 BAILII flag 640
Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago v Ramanoop [2005] UKPC 15; [2006] 1 AC 328; [2005] 2 WLR 1324; (2005) 66 WIR 334 Privy Council United Kingdom 23 Mar 2005 BAILII flag 181
Observer Publications Ltd v Matthew [2001] UKPC 11; 10 BHRC 252; (2001) 58 WIR 188; (2001) 3 CHRLD 158 Privy Council United Kingdom 19 Mar 2001 BAILII flag 37
Ahnee v DPP [1999] UKPC 11; [1999] 2 AC 294; [1999] 2 WLR 1305 Privy Council United Kingdom 17 Mar 1999 BAILII flag 87
R v Hull University Visitor; Ex parte Page [1992] UKHL 12; [1993] AC 682; [1993] 1 All ER 97; [1993] 3 WLR 1112 House of Lords United Kingdom 3 Dec 1992 BAILII flag 172
R v University of London; Ex parte Vijayatunga [1988] QB 322; [1987] 3 All ER 204; [1988] 2 WLR 106 United Kingdom circa 1988 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 10
[1988] QBD 322 [1988] QBD 322 Queen's Bench United Kingdom circa 1988 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 1
Thomas v University of Bradford [1987] AC 795; [1987] 1 All ER 834; [1987] ICR 245; [1987] 2 WLR 677 United Kingdom circa 1987 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 47
Hadmor Productions Ltd v Hamilton [1983] 1 AC 191; [1982] 1 All ER 1042; [1982] IRLR 104; [1982] ICR 114; [1982] 2 WLR 322; 126 Sol Jo 134 United Kingdom circa 1983 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 507
human right or fundamental freedom does not of itself entitle an applicant to invoke the section 14 procedure if it is apparent this allegation is an abuse of process because it is made "solely for the purpose of avoiding the necessity of applying in the normal way for the appropriate judicial remedy for unlawful administrative action which involves no contravention of any human right" [1981] AC 265 United Kingdom circa 1981 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 8
Murdoch University v Bloom & Kyle [1980] WAR 193 Australia - Western Australia circa 1980 LexisNexis AU flag 10
Harrikissoon v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago [1979] UKPC 3; [1980] AC 265; [1979] 3 WLR 62 Privy Council United Kingdom 15 Jan 1979 BAILII flag 124
Patel v University of Bradford   [1978] 3 All ER 841; [1978] 3 WLR 1488; [1978] 3All ER 841 United Kingdom circa 1978 LexisNexis flag 22
Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1; [1954] 3 All ER 745; [1954] 1 WLR 1489; [1954] FLRRep 422; [1954] 1 WIR 1489 England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division United Kingdom - England and Wales 29 Nov 1954 BAILII flag 1709
R v Dunsheath, Ex p Meredith [1951] 1 KB 127; [1950] 2 All ER 741 United Kingdom circa 1951 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 16
Rex v Bishop of Ely (1794) 5 D & E 475 King's Bench United Kingdom circa 1794 flag 4
Rusholm v Chapman [1793] EngR 1604; 101 ER 267; (1793) 5 TR 473 United Kingdom circa 1793 CommonLII flag 2
Borthwick v Carruthers [1787] EngR 75; (1787) 1 TR 648; 99 ER 1300 United Kingdom circa 1787 CommonLII flag 13
Bishop of Chichester v Harward and Webber(l787) (1787) 1 D & E 650 King's Bench United Kingdom circa 1787 flag 4
R v The Dean & Chapter of Chester 15 QB 511 United Kingdom circa 1981 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 1
R v Bishop of Chester(l747) 1 BLR 22 circa 1981 1
1 All Er 88 1 All ER 88 United Kingdom circa 1981 LexisNexis flag 1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback