LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court † | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
R (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department |
[2005] EWCA Civ 982; |
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division | United Kingdom - England and Wales | 27 Jul 2005 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ladd v Marshall |
[1954] EWCA Civ 1; |
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division | United Kingdom - England and Wales | 29 Nov 1954 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
R v Hull University Visitor; Ex parte Page |
[1992] UKHL 12; |
House of Lords | United Kingdom | 3 Dec 1992 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Rex v Bishop of Ely |
|
King's Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1794 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Bishop of Chichester v Harward and Webber(l787) |
|
King's Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1787 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago v Ramanoop |
[2005] UKPC 15; |
Privy Council | United Kingdom | 23 Mar 2005 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Observer Publications Ltd v Matthew |
[2001] UKPC 11; |
Privy Council | United Kingdom | 19 Mar 2001 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ahnee v DPP |
[1999] UKPC 11; |
Privy Council | United Kingdom | 17 Mar 1999 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Harrikissoon v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago |
[1979] UKPC 3; |
Privy Council | United Kingdom | 15 Jan 1979 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[1988] QBD 322 |
|
Queen's Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1988 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() |
Thomas v University of Bradford |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1987 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
R v The Dean & Chapter of Chester |
|
United Kingdom | circa 2005 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() |
|
R v University of London; Ex parte Vijayatunga |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1988 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Hadmor Productions Ltd v Hamilton |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1983 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
1 All Er 88 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 2005 | LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() |
|
R v Dunsheath, Ex p Meredith |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1951 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
Rusholm v Chapman |
[1793] EngR 1604; |
United Kingdom | circa 1793 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Patel v University of Bradford |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1978 | LexisNexis |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
human right or fundamental freedom does not of itself entitle an applicant to invoke the section 14 procedure if it is apparent this allegation is an abuse of process because it is made "solely for the purpose of avoiding the necessity of applying in the normal way for the appropriate judicial remedy for unlawful administrative action which involves no contravention of any human right" |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1981 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Murdoch University v Bloom & Kyle |
|
Australia - Western Australia | circa 1980 | LexisNexis AU |
![]() |
![]() |
|
R v Bishop of Chester(l747) |
|
circa 1981 |
![]() |
||||
Borthwick v Carruthers |
[1787] EngR 75; |
United Kingdom | circa 1787 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |