Re Nevil Martin Schoenmakers v DPP
|
[1991] FCA 457; (1991) 31 FCR 429; 105 ALR 273; 58 A Crim R 38
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
26 Sep 1991
|
AustLII
|
|
|
R v Agius
|
[2012] SASC 136
|
Supreme Court of South Australia
|
Australia - South Australia
|
16 Jul 2012
|
AustLII
|
|
|
Re McKinnon
|
(1986) 40 SASR 326
|
Supreme Court of South Australia
|
Australia - South Australia
|
circa 1986
|
Legal Online / Westlaw
|
|
|
Wooders v Tasmania
|
[2023] TASSC 35
|
Supreme Court of Tasmania
|
Australia - Tasmania
|
22 Sep 2023
|
AustLII
|
|
|
Mokbel v DPP (Vic) and DPP (Cth)
|
[2006] VSC 487; (2006) 14 VR 405; (2006) 170 A Crim R 179
|
Supreme Court of Victoria
|
Australia - Victoria
|
14 Dec 2006
|
AustLII
|
|
|
Wilkinson, Re
|
[1983] VicRp 85; [1983] 2 VR 250
|
|
Australia - Victoria
|
30 Sep 1981
|
AustLII
|
|
|
Condon, Re
|
[1973] VicRp 40; [1973] VR 427
|
|
Australia - Victoria
|
26 Sep 1972
|
AustLII
|
|
|
R v Maidstone Crown Court; Ex parte Lever & Connell
|
[1995] 2 All ER 35; [1995] 1 WLR 928
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1995
|
LexisNexis
|
|
|
Uxbridge Justices; Ex parte Heward-Mills
|
[1983] 1 All ER 530; [1983] 1 WLR 56
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1983
|
LexisNexis
|
|
|