Law
Cite|
|
LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
| Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index † | |
| CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Ltd |
[1994] FCA 396; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 22 Jun 1994 | AustLII |
|
 230 |
| Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents |
[2014] FCAFC 150; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 10 Nov 2014 | AustLII |
|
163 |
| Grant v Commissioner of Patents |
[2006] FCAFC 120; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 18 Jul 2006 | AustLII |
|
122 |
| International Business Machines Corporation v Commissioner of Patents |
[1991] FCA 625; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 13 Dec 1991 | AustLII |
|
107 |
| Apple Computer, Inc v Franklin Computer Corporation |
714 F2d 1240; |
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit | United States | 23 Sep 1983 | WorldLII |
|
50 |
| State Street Bank Trust Co v Signature Financial Group Inc |
149 F3d 1368; |
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 23 Jul 1998 | WorldLII |
|
43 |
| Union Carbide Corporation v American Can Co |
724 F2d 1567; |
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 4 Jan 1984 | WorldLII |
|
42 |
| Re Kuriappan P Alappat Edward E Averill and James G Larsen | 63 USLW 2088 | United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 29 Jul 1994 | WorldLII |
|
39 |
| Re Kuriappan P Alappat Edward E Averill and James G Larsen | 63 USLW 2088 | United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 29 Jul 1994 | WorldLII |
|
39 |
| Arrhythmia Research Technology Inc v Corazonix Corporation |
958 F2d 1053; |
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 5 May 1992 | WorldLII |
|
19 |
| Invention Pathways Pty Ltd, Re |
[2010] APO 10; |
IP Australia - Australian Patent Office | Australia | 21 Jul 2010 | AustLII |
|
16 |
| CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Ltd (No 2) |
[1993] FCA 653; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 24 Dec 1993 | AustLII |
|
15 |
| Re Rex D Schrader and Eugene D Klingaman |
22 F3d 290; |
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 5 May 1994 | WorldLII |
|
14 |
| Corporation v Excel Communications Inc |
172 F3d 1352; |
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 14 Apr 1999 | WorldLII |
|
13 |
| Tol-O-Matic Inc v Proma Produkt-Und Marketing Gesellschaft |
945 F2d 1546; |
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 26 Sep 1991 | WorldLII |
|
12 |
| Re Ralph R Grams and Dennis C Lezotte |
888 F2d 835; |
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 3 Nov 1989 | WorldLII |
|
11 |
| Re Max a Gulack |
703 F2d 1381; |
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 30 Mar 1983 | WorldLII |
|
11 |
| Howes v Great Lakes Press Corporation |
679 F2d 1023; |
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit | United States | 12 May 1982 | WorldLII |
|
11 |
| Re Edward S Lowry | 63 USLW 2184 | United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 19 Dec 1994 | WorldLII |
|
8 |
| Re Edward S Lowry | 63 USLW 2184 | United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 19 Dec 1994 | WorldLII |
|
8 |
| Re Thomas Ph Warmerdam and Bernard Jh Verwer |
33 F3d 1354; |
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 11 Aug 1994 | WorldLII |
|
8 |
| Alco Standard Corporation v Tennessee Valley Authority US | 808 F2d 1490 | United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 30 Dec 1986 | WorldLII |
|
6 |
| Johnson v Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation Dc L Eighmey |
717 F2d 574; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States - District of Columbia | 19 Aug 1983 | WorldLII |
|
6 |
| RPL Central Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents | [2013] FCA 871 | Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 30 Aug 2013 | AustLII |
|
5 |
| Peter Szabo and Associates Pty Ltd | [2005] APO 24 | IP Australia - Australian Patent Office | Australia | 5 May 2005 | AustLII |
|
5 |
| Network Solutions, LLC | [2011] APO 65 | IP Australia - Australian Patent Office | Australia | 19 Aug 2011 | AustLII |
|
4 |
| Hughes Aircraft Co | [1995] NZIPOPAT 3 | New Zealand Intellectual Property Office - Patents Decisions | New Zealand | 3 May 1995 | NZLII |
|
4 |
| Re Karen I Trovato and Leendert Dorst |
42 F3d 1376; |
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 19 Dec 1994 | WorldLII |
|
4 |
| Sheng-Ping Fang | [2011] APO 102 | IP Australia - Australian Patent Office | Australia | 20 Dec 2011 | AustLII |
|
2 |
| Smithkline Beecham Corporation Plc v Apotex Corporation Inc | 365 F3d 1306 | United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 23 Apr 2004 | WorldLII |
|
2 |
| National Patent Development Corporation v Tj Smith & Nephew Ltd |
877 F2d 1003; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States - District of Columbia | 16 Jun 1989 | WorldLII |
|
1 |
| National Patent Development Corporation v Tj Smith & Nephew Ltd |
865 F2d 353; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States - District of Columbia | 13 Jan 1989 | WorldLII |
|
1 |
| Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Dba Labcorp v Metabolite Laboratories, Inc | 543 US 1185 | United States Supreme Court | United States | 28 Feb 2005 | WorldLII |
|
|
| International Business MacHines Corporation |
[1990] APO 40; |
IP Australia - Australian Patent Office | Australia | 21 Nov 1990 | AustLII |
|
|
| Re Stuart Ockman | [1987] USCAFED 602 | United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 19 Oct 1987 | WorldLII |
|
|
| Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index † | |
| Johnson v Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation Dc L Eighmey |
717 F2d 574; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States - District of Columbia | 19 Aug 1983 | WorldLII |
|
6 |
| In re Toma |
|
United States | circa 1983 | Westlaw |
|
6 |
|
| In re Ghiron |
|
United States | circa 1983 | Westlaw |
|
6 |
|
| RPL Central Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents | [2013] FCA 871 | Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 30 Aug 2013 | AustLII |
|
5 |
| Peter Szabo and Associates Pty Ltd | [2005] APO 24 | IP Australia - Australian Patent Office | Australia | 5 May 2005 | AustLII |
|
5 |
| e g , In re Sarkar |
|
United States | circa 2005 | Westlaw |
|
5 |
|
| In re Richman |
|
United States | circa 2005 | Westlaw |
|
5 |
|
| In re Noll |
|
United States | circa 2005 | Westlaw |
|
5 |
|
| In re Benson |
|
United States | circa 2005 | Westlaw |
|
5 |
|
| In re Foster |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
5 |
||
| See In re Tarczy-Hornoch |
|
United States | circa 2005 | Westlaw |
|
5 |
|
| In re Shao Wen Yuan |
|
United States | circa 2005 | Westlaw |
|
5 |
|
| Network Solutions, LLC | [2011] APO 65 | IP Australia - Australian Patent Office | Australia | 19 Aug 2011 | AustLII |
|
4 |
| Hughes Aircraft Co | [1995] NZIPOPAT 3 | New Zealand Intellectual Property Office - Patents Decisions | New Zealand | 3 May 1995 | NZLII |
|
4 |
| Re Karen I Trovato and Leendert Dorst |
42 F3d 1376; |
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 19 Dec 1994 | WorldLII |
|
4 |
| PatApp 1973); In re Naquin |
|
United States | circa 1973 | Westlaw |
|
4 |
|
| Busch v Jones |
184 US 598; |
United States Supreme Court | United States | 17 Mar 1902 | WorldLII |
|
4 |
| In re Christensen |
|
United States | circa 1994 | Westlaw |
|
4 |
|
| Cir 1930); Chisholm-Ryder Co v Buck |
|
United States | circa 1930 | Westlaw |
|
3 |
|
| In re Gelnovatch |
|
United States | circa 1994 | Westlaw |
|
3 |
|
| e g , In re de Castelet |
|
United States | circa 1994 | Westlaw |
|
3 |
|
| Waldbaum |
|
United States | circa 1994 | Westlaw |
|
3 |
|
| In re Prater |
|
United States | circa 1994 | Westlaw |
|
3 |
|
| Sheng-Ping Fang | [2011] APO 102 | IP Australia - Australian Patent Office | Australia | 20 Dec 2011 | AustLII |
|
2 |
| "Storyline Patents: Are Plots Patentable" | (2009) 33 Melbourne University Law Review 292 | McEniery, Ben | Australia | circa 2009 | AustLII |
|
2 |
| Smithkline Beecham Corporation Plc v Apotex Corporation Inc | 365 F3d 1306 | United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 23 Apr 2004 | WorldLII |
|
2 |
| "Patents for Algorithms in Australia" | (1998) 20 Sydney Law Review 517 | Christie, Andrew; Syme, Serena | Australia | circa 1998 | AustLII |
|
2 |
| In re Ashbaugh |
|
United States | circa 1949 | Westlaw |
|
2 |
|
| Black-Clawson Co v Centrifugal Engineering & Patents Corporation |
|
United States | circa 1936 | Westlaw |
|
2 |
|
| (1936) 299 US 554 |
|
United States Supreme Court | United States | circa 1936 | Westlaw |
|
2 |
| In re Flook |
|
United States | circa 1936 | Westlaw |
|
2 |
|
| In re Deutsch |
|
United States | circa 1936 | Westlaw |
|
2 |
|
| In re McIlroy |
|
United States | circa 1936 | Westlaw |
|
2 |
|
| Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co v Walker |
|
United States | circa 1936 | Westlaw |
|
2 |
|
| Legal Protection for Software | 7 Rutgers Journal of Computers Technology and the Law 269 | Rutgers Journal of Computers, Technology and the Law | United States |
|
2 |
||
| Common Law Protection For Products of the Mind: An "Idea" Whose Time Has Come | (2006) 119 Harvard Law Review 703 | Miller, Arthur R | United States | 1 Jan 2006 | WorldLII |
|
1 |
| "An Empirical Investigation into Patent Enforcement in Australian Courts" | (2005) 33 (2) Federal Law Review 239 | Weatherall, Kimberlee G; Jensen, Paul H | Australia | circa 2005 | AustLII |
|
1 |
| National Patent Development Corporation v Tj Smith & Nephew Ltd |
877 F2d 1003; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States - District of Columbia | 16 Jun 1989 | WorldLII |
|
1 |
| National Patent Development Corporation v Tj Smith & Nephew Ltd |
865 F2d 353; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States - District of Columbia | 13 Jan 1989 | WorldLII |
|
1 |
| Lyman v L Ladd |
347 F2d 482; |
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit | United States | 14 Apr 1965 | WorldLII |
|
1 |
| [1793] Act 7 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1793 |
|
1 |
||
| 191-193 Ccpa 602 |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| 829 Off Gaz Pat Office 865 |
|
United States | circa 1989 |
|
1 |
||
| In re Phillips |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Diehr |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Waldbaum |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Venner |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Gartner |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
1 |
||
| In re Horvath |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
1 |
||
| In re Lundberg |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Abrams |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Nichols |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
1 |
||
| In re Middleton |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Solakian |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Heritage |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| Ex parte King |
|
United States | circa 1989 |
|
1 |
||
| e g , In re Cooper |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Mead |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| 101 PP 185-191 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1989 |
|
1 |
||
| 101 PP 181-193 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1989 |
|
1 |
||
| In re Wadman |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Parker |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re McCurdy |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Ernst |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| In re Bolongaro |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| 62 American Bar Association Journal 906 | 62 American Bar Association Journal 906 | American Bar Association Journal | United States | circa 1989 | HeinOnline |
|
1 |
| e g , Don Lee, Inc v Walker |
|
United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
|
| 53 Oregon Law Review 501 |
|
Oregon Law Review | United States | circa 1989 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
1 |
| 50 Notre Dame Lawyer 333 |
|
Notre Dame Lawyer | United States | circa 1989 | Westlaw |
|
1 |
| 38 New York University Law Review 891 | 38 New York University Law Review 891 | New York University Law Review | United States | circa 1989 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
1 |
| e g , In re Weston |
|
United States - District of Columbia | circa 1989 |
|
1 |
||
| Novick & Wallenstein, The Algorithm and Computer Software Patentability: A Scientific View of a Legal Problem | 7 Rutgers Journal of Computers Technology and the Law 313 | Rutgers Journal of Computers, Technology and the Law | United States |
|
1 |
||
| Davis, Computer Programs and Subject Matter Patentability | 6 Rutgers Journal of Computers Technology and the Law 1 | Rutgers Journal of Computers, Technology and the Law | United States |
|
1 |
||
| 1 Computer Law Journal 1 |
|
Computer Law Journal | United States |
|
1 |
||
| "Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics Inc: Are Genes Information or Molecules?" | (2014) 36 Sydney Law Review 557 | Orford, Jack | Australia | circa 2014 | AustLII |
|
|
| "A Judicial Axe for Sharp Drafting: The 'Natural Phenomenon' Dilemma" | [2012] JlLawInfoSci 21 | Mee, Ben | Australia | circa 2012 | AustLII |
|
|
| "Implications of DNA Patenting: Reviewing the Evidence" | [2011] JlLawInfoSci 3 | Nicol, Dianne | Australia | circa 2011 | AustLII |
|
|
| "Understanding the Machine-or-Transformation Test: Bilski , v Kappos" | [2011] INJlIPLaw 6 | Killi, Hima Bindu | India | circa 2011 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
| "Reflections on patentable subject matter in United States and Australian patent law" (FCA) | [2010] FedJSchol 18 | Greenwood, Justice Andrew | Australia | circa 2010 | AustLII |
|
|
| "Case Brief: Bilski v Kappos" | [2010] JlLawInfoSci 6 | Hughes, Anton | Australia | circa 2010 | AustLII |
|
|
| "Patentability of Non-Physical Inventions: Lessons from the United States, The" | (2009) 35 Monash University Law Review 376 | McEniery, Ben | Australia | circa 2009 | AustLII |
|
|
| "The Software Patent Thicket: A Matter Of Disclosure" | (2009) 62 SCRIPT-ed 207 | R M Ballardini | United Kingdom | circa 2009 | BAILII |
|
|
| "Pathological Patenting: The PTO as Cause or Cure" | (2006) 104 Michigan Law Review 1559 | Dreyfuss, Rochelle | United States | 1 Jan 2006 | WorldLII |
|
|
| Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Dba Labcorp v Metabolite Laboratories, Inc | 543 US 1185 | United States Supreme Court | United States | 28 Feb 2005 | WorldLII |
|
|
| "Patenting Health Related Database and Information in Australia" | (2005) 17 Bond Law Review 58 | Lawson, Charles | Australia | circa 2005 | AustLII |
|
|
| "Evolution of Patenting Software, The" | (2005) 12 James Cook University Law Review 11 | Place, AG | Australia | circa 2005 | AustLII |
|
|
| "Patenting Biotechnology" | [2004] JILT 7 | G Zekos | United Kingdom | circa 2004 | BAILII |
|
|
| "Certifying Uncertainty: Assessing the Proposed Directive on the Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions" | [2004] JILT 24 | L Egitto | United Kingdom | circa 2004 | BAILII |
|
|
| "A Comment on Software, Patents, Innovation and Openness" | [2003] JlLawInfoSci 3 | Hughes, Anton | Australia | circa 2003 | AustLII |
|
|
| Patenting Insurance Related Business Methods: Predictability and Risk (R Soetendorp) | [2003] JILT 8 | Journal of Information, Law & Technology | United Kingdom | circa 2003 | BAILII |
|
|
| "Internet Patents: Will They Hinder the Development of E-Commerce?" | [2001] JILT 2 | K Henderson & H Kane | United Kingdom | circa 2001 | BAILII |
|
|
| "An Argument Against Business Method Patents Demonstrating That Algorithms Are Abstract and Business Methods Are Obvious" | [2001] JlLawInfoSci 2 | Gladstone, Julia Alpert; Esq | Australia | circa 2001 | AustLII |
|
|
| Lea, Gary --- "The Revolution That Never Was: A Cynic's Eye View of the Software, Business and E-Commerce Method Patenting Controversy in the Wake of State Street" [2000] DigTechLawJl 4 | (2000) 2 Digital Technology Law Journal 4 | Gary Lea | Australia | circa 2000 | AustLII |
|
|
| "Streaming the Software Development Process Through Reuse and Patents" | [1999] JlLawInfoSci 4 | Moens, Annelies | Australia | circa 1999 | AustLII |
|
|
| "Report on the protection afforded Computer Software in the face of Computer Software Piracy" | [1996] JILT 40 | P Redding | United Kingdom | circa 1996 | BAILII |
|
|
| It Doesn't Fit: The Dilemma of Computer Software and Patent / Copyright Law | [1996] MurUEJL 2 | Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law | Australia | circa 1996 | AustLII |
|
|
| "Recent Software Patent Developments in the United States" | [1994] JlLawInfoSci 17 | Swinson, John | Australia | circa 1994 | AustLII |
|
|
| "Software Patents in the United States" | [1993] JlLawInfoSci 9 | Swinson, John v | Australia | circa 1993 | AustLII |
|
|
| International Business MacHines Corporation |
[1990] APO 40; |
IP Australia - Australian Patent Office | Australia | 21 Nov 1990 | AustLII |
|
|
| Re Stuart Ockman | [1987] USCAFED 602 | United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit | United States | 19 Oct 1987 | WorldLII |
|
|