AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Land and Environment Court of New South Wales

You are here: 
AustLII >> Databases >> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales >> 2016 >> [2016] NSWLEC 1173

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Context | Help

JAM Ventures Australia Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1173 (6 May 2016)

New South Wales Land and Environment Court

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Help]

JAM Ventures Australia Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1173 (6 May 2016)

Last Updated: 11 May 2016



Land and Environment Court
New South Wales

Case Name:
JAM Ventures Australia Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council
Medium Neutral Citation:
Hearing Date(s):
Conciliation conference on 1 March, 11, 26 April, 3 May 2016
Date of Orders:
6 May 2016
Decision Date:
6 May 2016
Jurisdiction:
Class 1
Before:
Tuor C
Decision:
See (4) below
Catchwords:
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited:
Category:
Principal judgment
Parties:
JAM Ventures Australia Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Leichhardt Municipal Council (Respondent)
Representation:
Mr G Christmas, Apex Planning & Environment Law (Applicant)

Mr M Bonanno, Leichhardt Municipal Council (Respondent)
File Number(s):
10011 of 2016

JUDGMENT

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.

................

Annelise Tuor

Commissioner

10011 of 2016 - Order (13.6 KB, pdf)

10011 of 2016 - Annexure A (189 KB, pdf)

10011 of 2016 -Basix Certificate (248 KB, pdf)

10011 of 2016 - CONSOLIDATED DRAWINGS-160414 (8.76 MB, pdf)


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWLEC/2016/1173.html